So here's a funny thing: I have 3 Fs and 1 D on my transcript, but my GPA is ~3.8, which is "high" because I double majored in math and computer science. The reason for those 4 bad grades is that I had 2 bad semesters where I suffered from depression; I didn't drop the classes before the deadline so I ended up failing the classes. However I retook the classes and got As in them (hence my GPA), and in fact got A/A-s in all subsequent classes (quite an improvement). I plan to apply to a master's for computer science, and eventually a phd. However I know the admission officers eyes will bleed when they see my transcript, despite my GPA, because my school keeps ALL grades on transcripts, even if the grades were replaced by retaking classes. Do I still have a chance at top-10 graduate school for computer science even with these grades (which were retaken and then aced)?
Closely related: academia.stackexchange.com/q/29494/19607– KimballJun 15, 2015 at 10:34
24I know the admission officers eyes will bleed — First, graduate schools in the US typically don't have "admissions officers"; admissions committees are composed of faculty. Second, nobody's eyes are going to bleed over a couple of Fs that you later turned into As; the most likely reaction is "Huh? Oh, wow!!"– JeffEJun 15, 2015 at 15:59
1Why do you care so much about grades? From my experience (employers in Europe) do not care if I aced math or whatever, they care about what I can do with it... I read you want phd and I have no clue how grades affect that.– KyslikJun 16, 2015 at 9:13
1I also think this is more of a "Wow!" thing. You don't give up hope. That is a good sign.– Ozgur OzturkJun 16, 2015 at 14:58
2The impression I get from the replies is that it's still likely to be detrimental (how much so, I don't know). I'm tired enough of applicants typically trying to blend in with the flock that I'd not only overlook such a so-called blemish but in fact give OP brownie points were I in a position to do so. It's really too bad so many people outright refuse to not count or to ignore something and feel compelled to take each thing into account in the same formulaic manner and have it have some effect on the bottom line, unconditionally, no matter what.– VandermondeJun 16, 2015 at 18:55
In my (rather extensive) experience with graduate admissions, admissions committees understand that people have semesters in which life interferes with school. If you've retaken the classes and received high marks in them, this very clearly signals that something was interfering with your performance during those two semesters and that the bad grades have nothing to do with your underlying ability. Those grades won't go unnoticed -- but nor will they hurt you the way they would had you not repeated and aced those courses.
It would help further if you have a trusted mentor who could mention and--to the degree that you comfortable, explain--this issue in his or her letter of recommendation.
Don't count on cruising through the application process, but also don't lower your ambitions based on these grades.
I'm on the graduate admissions committee of a top 10 computer science program. If you very briefly explained the circumstances and pointed out that you re-took the classes and got As and have gotten high grades ever since, I doubt these particular marks would be held against you.
As a former member of a graduate program committee who has reviewed hundreds of applications I can give my opinion. Address the F's directly and briefly in your application letter, say you had a problem, point out the retakes, and tell them you learned from the experience.
I personally have three advanced degrees and a few F's on my undergraduate transcript.
"Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterward." - Vernon Law
I knew someone had a similar situation and he's in MIT as a PhD student now. So just clarify what happened in your application materials.
Just write a short letter explaining the three anomalous grades. You don't have to get into the details of the depression, though.
My experience was very similar to yours. I had four F's an a D (or two) from when I abruptly dropped out years before. My GPA was ultimately 3.5, with a 3.95 in CS at a middling school. That, along with enthusiastic (but not particularly high quality) references got me into a few good schools -- I ended up going to one in the top five. You should note though that there are two types of masters programs: project-based and research-based. Project-based, which is what I did, are much easier to get in to. They are for students who want to get a masters and get out. Generally they will not be funded. A research-based masters is for students who intend to go on to get a PhD. They are generally much more difficult to get into and often are funded. If you find you are having trouble getting into a PhD or masters->PhD program, you might want to look into a project-based program with a good school. You might be able to work on something with a prof you like and get into the PhD program on their recommendation. I've seen it happen several times.
ETA: Remember, the main thing admissions people are interested in is the last thing you did. So if you find you can't get into the best PhD program, go to whatever place best fits your interests (that you can get into, of course) and put together some quality research. No one will care what you did in undergrad.
It also depends on the academic reputation of your undergraduate school. Is it a widely appraised school? You should be fine as long as you have a 3.5 or higher, and decent GRE scores (generally 1100 and higher). Top 10 is very ambitious! They will look over your transcript, and degree of difficulty of your classes you've taken. Also they will take into account how well you did in the last few semesters. If you have gotten A's in the last few semesters, it's good indication that you'll do well in grad school, in their opinions.