9

Albeit arXiv offers RSS news feeds for subject areas updates, it is also possible to track an individual paper for updates (such as if it was submitted and/or accepted to a journal)?

6

This is a pretty silly solution, but you can use a page tracking service to see when the page changes; this should detect both changes in the paper as well as in the journal its submitted to.

Edited as per Jaap Eldering's suggestions in the comments: you can use arXiv's OAI-PMH protocol to programmatically access version history! For example, if you want to look up arXiv #1206.0094, you can look up http://export.arxiv.org/oai2?verb=GetRecord&identifier=oai:arXiv.org:1206.0094&metadataPrefix=arXivRaw for its version history.

Furthermore, arXiv does have an Atom feed for individual articles: you can access it at http://export.arxiv.org/api/query?id_list=1206.0094 -- the link it includes is to the latest version of the article, so I presume it will change if the article is updated.

  • 2
    Dear Gaurav, that is a good idea. Unfortunately, arXiv blocks page tracking services by its robots.txt. – shamisen Jun 11 '15 at 21:54
  • 2
    Instead of trying to track the normal webpage for the paper, you could track the page by one of the means listed on arxiv.org/help/bulk_data, e.g. the arXivRaw format. – Jaap Eldering Jun 12 '15 at 18:45
  • @JaapEldering Those are excellent suggestions -- I've incorporated them into my answer! If you want to add them to your own answer, I'll delete them from mine. – Gaurav Jun 12 '15 at 20:02
  • No problem, you can have them ;-) – Jaap Eldering Jun 13 '15 at 13:12
4

These updates get announced in the email digest, don't they? So, you could subscribe to the appropriate email digest and filter for messages that contain the URLs of the papers you're interested in.

  • 2
    There is an exception that might be important: after version 5 of a paper, any further updates are not announced in the email digest. So if the authors are prolific with their updates, this may not help. – Nate Eldredge Jun 12 '15 at 21:44
  • 1
    @NateEldredge - that's a good point and one I hadn't been aware of. Gaurav and JaapEldering's amended solution might be better, then. – Gregory J. Puleo Jun 12 '15 at 21:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.