I've recently published a paper. It's available online, but not published on hard copies yet. What should I do If I find out that there is a typo (repeated many times) in a recently published paper of mine at Elsevier?

  • 1
    Could you be a little more explicit about the typo? Commented May 1, 2015 at 18:02
  • 1
    possible duplicate of Are spelling and/or grammar mistakes a cause for submitting Errata?
    – Wrzlprmft
    Commented May 1, 2015 at 18:15
  • 7
    It can't hurt to get in touch with Elsevier and ask them. They may tell you it's too late to make any changes (this is almost certainly the case unless you returned the proofs very recently), or they may tell you the early copy online now isn't finalized yet. Either way, you'll find out. Commented May 1, 2015 at 18:33
  • @Wrzlprmft I think that even though closely related, this is not a duplicate because it is a) not yet through the publication process and b) "many times" as opposed to just one.
    – jakebeal
    Commented May 1, 2015 at 18:38

2 Answers 2


Contact the editor you worked with and let them know. They will advise you of your options and hopefully work with you to update the online version and (if possible) either delay or fix the print version.


There are two pieces of information missing in your question, but it might be better to consider each case anyway, so that my answer might help others. The first thing is whether the typo may lead to misinterpretation of your work, is an error in formulas, or anything that will harm the scientific meaning of your work. The second thing is whether you or the publisher introduced it.

If the typo is not misleading in any way (e.g. embarrassing but harmless spelling error), it is probably not worth doing much, whoever made the mistake. If the preprint version of your article is on your web page or on a repository, you should ensure it is free from the typo, and you might want to point out that the published version has this typo, but I would not see the point of going further than that.

If the typo is actually harmful, may cause misinterpretation of your work or may make it partly unintelligible, then who made the error is more important. In any case, contact the publisher and the chief editor to see how to handle it. Of course, if you did the error, you have to be apologetic while if the publisher did, you can be more demanding. The most probable outcome is that an errata will be issued. Most journals have only one version of each article, and thus cannot afford to change anything between electronic publication and print publication; however strange it may seem I saw many errata being printed in the same issue than the article they correct. Maybe electronic born journal are in a position to handle this better.

For the story, my very first article got published (both electronically and in print) with a repeated "typo": half a dozen of $n/2$ and $(n+1)/2$ where replaced by $n^2$ and $(n+1)^2$. I realized that when I received the offprints, and could not believe it. I knew I did not made the mistake, but at first I thought I did not checked the galley proofs closely enough. It turned out that the typos where introduced after the galley proofs. This made a strong case, and a corrected version of the article was reprinted entirely in a subsequent issue.

I think it fair to mention that the publisher was Springer, but I have heard similar horror stories from most big, expensive commercial publishers.

  • 1
    What's the big deal? You only would have had to wait a year to post a corrected version.
    – Corvus
    Commented May 1, 2015 at 21:37
  • 5
    I recently had a similar case with Elsever in which I returned proofs with corrections to be made, but the corrections weren't made correctly (in particular, a URL got mangled by the type setters so that the live link was broken.) The Elsevier system doesn't give the author a chance to confirm that the corrections to page proofs were done correctly, and simply tells you that it's impossible to make changes after the type setters are done with the article. I was able to get this problem resolved, but only by contacting the editor in chief of the journal. Commented May 1, 2015 at 22:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .