It's been six weeks since I have sent paper for a second review after I received revise&resubmit decision from the first round. Is this a typical time period or should I send a query to the journal?

Currently the paper is under the status "with editor" for a couple of days after it has been "under review". The journal is in the field of telecommunications.

  • 4
    I've had a major revision turned around in 3 weeks, and a minor revision turned around in 3 months. Anything is possible. – Mad Jack Apr 20 '15 at 14:19

The time for the second go-around is often the same as for the first go-around. So, if the journal allows reviewers 3 months for a review, you have to expect this much (at least) also for the review of the revision.

| improve this answer | |
  • Shouldn't it be much shorter because reviewers are already familiar with the paper? – Quirik Apr 21 '15 at 6:41
  • 1
    Maybe. But that doesn't mean that they will move it up on their priority list. – Wolfgang Bangerth Apr 21 '15 at 12:41
  • I know it is a field-specific question, but as a general rule, how long it takes after the status is Decision in process? – Quirik Apr 28 '15 at 13:05
  • It means that the reviewers have written their reports and the editor needs to make a decision. For me this typically takes 2-3 days, but others handle things in batch. I would think that if an editor takes 2-3 weeks, then that is fair. – Wolfgang Bangerth Apr 28 '15 at 17:30
  • I suppose that the time needed doesn't mean anything about the outcome? – Quirik Apr 28 '15 at 17:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.