I'm an undergraduate in mathematics, and won't be finishing my Bachelor's degree until next Spring or next Fall (2016). I plan on applying for a master's program before possibly moving onto a PhD (if I like the research) after I get my bachelor's.

Should I start studying GRE-type material now, even if just in my free time, to hopefully have a bit more of an intimate knowledge of the kinds of questions it will ask, as well as really solidify my problem solving in those areas? Or is that overkill?

closed as off-topic by Corvus, jakebeal, Enthusiastic Engineer, Peter Jansson, gerrit Apr 3 '15 at 21:59

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:

  • "This question appears to be off-topic because it seems to seek specific advice for a very specific situation, and it's likely that only someone with a good understanding of your situation will be able to provide an objectively correct answer." – jakebeal, gerrit
  • "Questions that cannot be generalized to apply to others in similar situations are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that can apply to multiple people facing similar situations, see: What kinds of questions are too localized?" – Corvus, Peter Jansson
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    Yes, the sooner the better – Thomas Lee Apr 2 '15 at 22:16
  • 2
    It would at least be worth looking at some sample questions and taking a practice test. This will give you some idea of what you should study and how much over the next year. – Nate Eldredge Apr 2 '15 at 22:24
  • The general test? Or the subject test? – Aru Ray Apr 2 '15 at 22:29
  • @AruRay, whichever is required for most master's admissions :-) – galois Apr 2 '15 at 22:39
  • Hard to know how to advise you, since we random strangers on the internet don't know whether you'll have a hard time with the GREs or even whether the places you apply will even want them (my university didn't). – jakebeal Apr 2 '15 at 22:42

First, the GRE, especially the subject test in math, is a very highly stylized version of a very particular slice of a fairly low-level piece of school-mathematics... Whatever one thinks about it, it is widely used, and its idiosyncrasies and limitations are often over-looked for the sake of the convenience of having a single number to (supposedly usefully) compare people from very different backgrounds. Thus, you don't want to show up and be surprised by what it is, for sure! As in comments, do some practice exams to see what the questions are...

Also, do think in terms of the possibilities for "gaming" a multiple-choice exam. The most successful of your competitors will have some success with that aspect, apart from knowing or not-knowing mathematics.

But do not let the GRE too-much affect studying actual mathematics. For example, things that don't admit "testing" by multiple-choice questions can't make it onto the GRE, yet arguably are far more important in the larger enterprise than things that can.

The possibility of gaming the exam also means that "problem solving" is not really what it's about. It's about doing enough diagnostic stuff to eliminate wrong choices, and then whatever's left has to be right. This is methodologically wildly different from the practice of mathematics.

  • When you say the subject test, do you mean the math part of the general test? Because my understanding is that the math GRE is quite advanced. – Tobias Kildetoft Apr 3 '15 at 7:25

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.