I often find myself lecturing for 7 hours in one day. This question is not about how to reduce my hours, it is about making healthy choices with my existing constraints.

I am lecturing to different classes during the day (it is not a single group of students for all 7 hours), in case that makes a difference.

I realize that during my lectures, I must choose what to do with my body. Should I sit (blood clots, deep-vein thrombus) or do I stand (I've heard non-lecturers complain about swelling legs when standing too much).

My questions are:

  • What impacts are known from standing while lecturing for 7 hours per day, 3 days per week?
  • Is it better to stand or to walk around?
  • Is it better to sit for the whole time?
  • Is it best to do a "little bit of everything?" If so, where is the optimal balance?

I realize that this might be specific to the person but I am hoping to find some experiences or, even better, research, which will indicate the best choices to make when one must lecture for many hours.

  • This is really more of a general health question, but there currently isn't a suitable site on SE at least for such a question. The new Heath site in commitment would be suitable once it gets going. Regardless, 7 hours of lecturing sounds like a whole lot of lecturing. Is this an average or an exceptional day? "often" is a bit vague. Not really relevant, just curious. Commented Mar 9, 2015 at 8:10
  • @FaheemMitha I understand your perspective but I believe the physical aspect of lecturing is not repeated in many professions. Therefore, I believe it does fit here. BTW, I often lecture 7 hours per day, 3 days per week (yes, it's a lot).
    – earthling
    Commented Mar 9, 2015 at 10:41
  • I agree the question is on topic here. It was just a suggestion/comment. Though people do lecture outside universities. E.g. in schools. Commented Mar 9, 2015 at 10:50
  • 2
    I'd be more worried about the impact on my throat... Commented Mar 9, 2015 at 21:57
  • @MassimoOrtolano You mean like this question? :-)
    – earthling
    Commented Mar 9, 2015 at 22:18

2 Answers 2


The health impacts of standing while doing a job are known to be strongly positive, compared to sitting while performing a similar function. For the seminal paper on this, see Morris et al., 1953 in the Lancet (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673653914950). Morris examined the incidence of heart disease in bus drivers vs. bus conductors. The former spend the day sat at the wheel while the latter spend the day walking around the bus collecting fares and enforcing the rules. This occupation was chosen because drivers and conductors come from the same socio-economic conditions and were expected to be fairly similar in every respect except for their working activity. Naturally the incidence was sharply reduced in the conductors. A casual Google Scholar search will pick up more recent references, and the health benefits of standing vs. sitting are widespread.

One can imagine that standing for very long periods of time repeatedly might cause problems, particularly on the feet or ankles, but seven hours a day a few times a week is not really anything to be excited about. Many people work in bars or restaurants, on building sites, in hospitals and so on doing much more labour intensive work with shift lengths exceeding twelve hours, six days a week.

All I would say is ensure you wear comfortable shoes!

  • Bus conductors do walk (as opposed to e.g. surgeons who are forced to stand still), and even while they stand they use different muscles to keep equilibrium with the accellerations of a moving bus. Commented Mar 10, 2015 at 12:48
  • Yes, of course there will be differences. In general though I would be surprised to find any situation where sitting is healthier than standing. [ Except, perhaps, riding a horse. ;) ]
    – Calchas
    Commented Mar 10, 2015 at 13:33
  • 1
    @cbeleites Once you lecture standing, you'll move, too.
    – yo'
    Commented Mar 10, 2015 at 13:40
  • Calchas: I wouldn't be sure forced sitting still (bus driver) is better than forced standing still (surgeon). But I'd attribute the problems to being static. But as @yo' correctly points out this needn't be the problem in a lecture. Though lectures often don't come with that much movement, so I'd say that trying to move more is good. Commented Mar 10, 2015 at 13:46

I don't have hard evidence at hand, but I'd guess

  • a bit of everything is probably good

  • Walking around is better than standing still or sitting only. One way of doing this could be to walk back and forth between slide changing (keyboard) and a lecturing position somewhere forming a triangle with students and projected slide.

  • Some colleagues of mine who have to stand a lot in somewhat similar settings like unstable "rocking chair" shoes.
  • AFAIK, people who get swollen feet while standing tend to have the same problem when sitting for a long time. Which is plausible because the swelling has to do with the valves in leg veins and lymphatic vessels not working properly. Walking is better because the calf muscles help getting the blood back up. But for optimal results you need to use all kinds of muscles of the calf and foot, which you normally don't do on flat floors (this would be an argument for the rocking chair shoes, but I have no idea whether they actually help). OTOH, sitting on a table with legs dangling is really bad with resped to swollen feet: the edge compresses the veins in the upper leg. The same can happen with chairs that have the wrong (backward) seat slope and/or height.
  • Making good use of breaks could also help without distracting students from the lecture because you do funny gymnastics. I knew a teacher who spent the lunch break doing a power nap with the feet up to prevent/alleviate swollen feet.

  • I don't lecture long times, but: my natural idea about lecturing is to do it standing: this way you are better seen by the students, gestures work better and the voice is better as well. Standing still becomes uncomfortable very soon (=> walk). I take this as a (possibly rather late) sign that the body needs to move, so walk. Obviously, you cannot hike or run around the lecture hall, although this would be more healthy than walking a few steps every once in a while: it would make the students crazy.
    Going on with this train of thought, I sit down when standing becomes uncomfortable. Again, I take this as a sign that some (back) muscles get tired from the standing position, so having some other posture for a while is a good idea.
    I call this primarily standing even if you walk a bit back and forth from the observation that I find it much easier to hike a whole day with a substantial (e.g. 25 kg) backback than to keep on my feet in these standing plus a tiny bit of walking postures.

  • The only time I have seen a lecturer give a lecture sitting down was when he was extremely hungover. It does not encourage the students to listen!
    – Calchas
    Commented Mar 10, 2015 at 14:56

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .