1

We submitted a paper more than one month ago, today we are asked to clarify one question in our paper. Does that mean the paper is just on the borderline right now?

13
  • Has the request for clarification been sent directly by the editor or is it part of the reviewers' comments? Jan 20, 2015 at 21:24
  • I think it's the editor. We only see that single request, no other comment yet.
    – monkinsane
    Jan 20, 2015 at 21:32
  • 1
    Without knowing the details, I can only make a couple of guesses: i) The editor spotted something which seems to be a major flaw (which is your fear, I suppose); ii) the editor is trying to understand if your paper is really fitted (in-topic) for the journal the paper has been sent to; Jan 20, 2015 at 21:46
  • While it's raised by some reviewer..Sorry I haven't made this clear.
    – monkinsane
    Jan 20, 2015 at 22:12
  • 1
    Thanks! It's a conference paper in computer engineering.
    – monkinsane
    Jan 22, 2015 at 17:12

1 Answer 1

3

One of the reviewers is unclear about one of the claims you are making. You could (for example) be making Claim A which you seem to have the data for, or you could be making Claim A' which is related but the fit isn't as strong.

While the reviewer could give you the benefit of the doubt (and ask you to clarify in revisions), they felt it was safer to ask ahead of time. If it was indeed Claim A', then your paper could have more serious flaws and would need more substantive revision.

I would reply as quickly as possible with the clarification and not try to over think it.

2
  • 1
    The reviewer had doubt on the scenario from which we raised our motivation. I have replied, arguing such scenario can be possible in the future, something like that.
    – monkinsane
    Jan 22, 2015 at 17:27
  • Sounds reasonable.
    – RoboKaren
    Jan 22, 2015 at 21:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .