I always thought PhD as being the main post grad research path if you wanted to get funded and that Msc was the way to get yourself ready for a PhD. I recently became aware that not all master courses are taught and some are research based, so I am wondering whether it's normal to do a research Msc (as opposed to a taught one) and if so, are there any advantages to this over just going for a PhD?


1 Answer 1


Advantages of doing a research-based Masters (e.g an MRes) before the PhD:

  • learn research skills
  • explore your subject
  • refine your research question
  • get a big chunk of your literature review done in a structured setting
  • work out if taking a PhD is really for you - whether you've got the aptitude and the interest

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .