I always thought PhD as being the main post grad research path if you wanted to get funded and that Msc was the way to get yourself ready for a PhD. I recently became aware that not all master courses are taught and some are research based, so I am wondering whether it's normal to do a research Msc (as opposed to a taught one) and if so, are there any advantages to this over just going for a PhD?


Advantages of doing a research-based Masters (e.g an MRes) before the PhD:

  • learn research skills
  • explore your subject
  • refine your research question
  • get a big chunk of your literature review done in a structured setting
  • work out if taking a PhD is really for you - whether you've got the aptitude and the interest

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.