2

Is there any research/study/survey that looked at authors' willingness to receive public, online feedback (e.g. public comments on the publisher' website) on the papers they publish?

I am mostly interested in the field of computer science > machine learning / NLP / data mining, and English-speaking venues.

  • 3
    Can you list one example for "public comments on the publisher's website"? I've never seen that with any of the reputable publishers. Probably the bottleneck here is not the authors, but rather the publisher, because there would be a lot of moderation work. – DCTLib Nov 28 '14 at 5:31
  • @DCTLib Sure, e.g. PLOS. Yes I wonder where the bottleneck is. – Franck Dernoncourt Nov 28 '14 at 5:42
  • 2
    Hmmm, PLOS is not really an example for a publication venue in computer science. – DCTLib Dec 2 '14 at 11:23
  • 1
    @DCTLib: Here is another reputable publisher's relevant comment, from PeerJ. "And rather than just tack on a blog like commenting system, we've built an entirely new way to interact and provide rich, structured feedback, ask questions, and add media links to any publication." – Todd Booth Mar 16 '15 at 15:53
  • @DCTLib NIPS proceedings have public reviews papers.nips.cc/book/…. This is one of the top tier machine learning conferences. – Sasho Nikolov May 8 '15 at 6:47
1

Here are two studies that appear to focus on this question:

Both studies find a lot of ambivalence in current attitudes: in essence, one the one hand, it could be useful, on the other hand Don't Read The Comments.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.