I submitted a manuscript to a journal for non-open-access publication and the editor came back and said that they want to publish the article as open-access (same journal) and waive the fee for this.

As not to be too broad, what implications does this have for my paper? Is it generally viewed positively to have OA publications? Really, in the end, I am trying to look at the pros/cons of saying yes/no to this.

  • 1
    "they want to publish the article as open-access (same journal) and waive the fee for this" -- maybe ask them why they want that for your article in particular? Oct 12, 2014 at 8:07
  • 1
    This means that your paper can be more widely accessed. Personally, I see no cons! But maybe I'm missing something?
    – user2768
    Oct 12, 2014 at 13:07

1 Answer 1


It is still an open question whether open access actually leads to more citations or not. This is at least partly because the models and players in OA are still rapidly shifting, especially with the rapidly increasing influx of low quality or scam publishers who have embraced open access because it is an easier way to bilk money out of insecure early-career academics.

I will assume, however, that you have already vetted the journal and know that it is a significant and reputable one in your field. Let us also assume that it really is just as you present: the article will still be published in exactly the same way, just not behind a paywall and this will cost you nothing. In that case, the general wisdom is that, all else being equal, an article that's easier to find and read is likely to have higher impact than one hidden behind a paywall.

Free open access in a normally closed journal is actually less unusual than you might think. For example:

  • Nature makes certain types of large community studies open by default.
  • Special issues and special collections in a journal are sometimes negotiated to be open access by their organizers. If your article fits with such an upcoming collection, it would be natural for it to become included in the policy.
  • Certain types of information, particularly in biomedical research, are required to be published open access (either immediately or within certain timeframes) by some government funding agencies

The real question is: what is the reason in your particular case? Ask the editor. If it's something that makes sense, like one of the cases above, then great! Embrace it and get some extra citations. If not, then ask yourself again whether you really trust this journal...

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .