When applying for a tenure-track academic position in the US right after my PhD (in the US too), is it a good idea to ask for a letter of recommendation from a professor in my graduate school with whom I took a class where I got good grades while showing a strong interest (genuine interest), then later on served as a TA for that class?

I haven't done any research project with him though, but we get along well: he is one of the professors I appreciate the most both intellectually and personally, I would have chosen him without any doubt as advisor if I was in his area. He is well-respected in his field (say in the top 20, if you want some ranking). His area of research is a bit different from mine but useful for my research: he works on database management systems while I do machine learning, so there are some very interesting connections such as large-scale machine learning / data analysis (~aka. "big data"), query optimization, etc.

  • maybe the fact you get along with him, and his rank affects your thinking? maybe you are looking for a reason to ask for a recommendation letter from him although you feel as if he does not have strong basis to give one? maybe just maybe... senior SE members who are members of committees can answer better this question Aug 10, 2014 at 21:02
  • @WolfgangKuehne Yes, I don't know whether teaching-only interactions without any research is enough to have a recommendation letter for an academic position that the members of the selection committee might find useful. I mentioned my relationship with the professor as well as his place in the research community in case that would influence the answers. Aug 10, 2014 at 21:39
  • 3
    You TAed for the class, so he should be able to speak to your teaching abilities. I've never been on a tenure-track hiring committee, but that's got to be a component of their needs.
    – Bill Barth
    Aug 10, 2014 at 23:29

2 Answers 2


It depends on the school. At a SLAC (small liberal arts college), the hiring committee members will pay more attention to teaching experience and may be more willing to be impressed by a Big Name®.

At a R1, faculty are not only inoculated against Big Names®, but they have enough experience with individual Big Names® to read between the lines of otherwise blandly positive letters with hermeneutic vigor.

I've been repeatedly surprised by my senior colleagues discussing letters from other Big Names® with "he only wrote two pages of song and praise? He must not have liked that person" or of a fairly damning letter with, "she's a grouch. The fact that she wrote at all means that this person is brilliant." Context is important.

A letter that spoke only of your teaching and not of your research would be seen as faint praise in this milieu.

Note that I'm in the humanistic social sciences at an R1. Your mileage may vary.

TL;DR: save the references from this person for SLACs where the praise for your teaching ability will be seen as a strong positive.

Also note that at larger R1s, we are familiar with the difference in writing styles between American (where everything is excessively effusive) and European/Asian letters (where a strong letter of recommendation reads: "Jon Smith was a member of my lab from 2005/10/1 to 2012/5/1. His work was perfectively adequate with no complaints. Sincerely, XX"). Smaller institutions may not have that experience and in those circumstances, you may ask one of your American letter writers to include a short paragraph noting that European counterparts thought highly of you but that might not show up in the letters in the hyperbolic form we are used to in the United States.

  • 1
    +1. This is pretty much everything I had to say on the matter, except better.
    – aeismail
    Oct 29, 2014 at 18:20
  • The SLAC where I teach does not seem to be impresssed by "big names." What matters more is a letter writer that has seen the candidate teach and can write convincingly about why they would be successful at a good SLAC. Letters from other SLAC professors are especially helpful (I hate to admit this). Mar 29 at 2:22

Having a recommendation letter that addresses your teaching ability and experience is useful if the search committee cares about teaching. Many advertisements specifically ask for at least one recommendation letter that addresses teaching, and I frequently see such letters when I look at applicant's files. Thus I don't think it would be unusual at all for you to have a letter of recommendation from your TA supervisor even though you haven't taken classes or worked on research with that person.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .