68

When two people in a couple are both in science, but specialised in different fields, how can they both find relevant positions but still be geographically reasonably proximate?

Compromise and change fields? Work part-time from a distance if employers' permit it (do they usually?)? Travel both quite far each day? One person leaves science?

Are there other ways to resolve this? Any personal experiences around here?

  • 4
    This is a fairly big topic; doing a search through Science (the journal) reveals many articles on this topic. Rather than link to them individually, I suggest you read through the different articles and learn what you can. – eykanal Jul 26 '12 at 12:10
  • 44
    This is commonly known as the "two-body problem". – Nate Eldredge Jul 26 '12 at 12:19
49

Many universities (like the one where my wife and I work) have dual-career hiring programs explicitly to address this issue. It's definitely worth asking—carefully—whether the universities you are considering have such a program.

Here's how our system works. Suppose Department X offers a faculty position to Partner A, and later department Y offers a faculty position to Partner B. Then Partner B's salary is paid 1/3 by department Y, 1/3 by department X, and 1/3 from a general campus fund.* (Note that X and Y may be the same department.)

So Department Y has a significant financial incentive to hire Partner B. On the other hand, Department X must be willing to pay extra for Partner A; in practice, however, once an faculty offer to A is actually on the table, most department chairs find it hard to refuse to help hire B.

This is why you have to be careful how and when you ask. It's illegal in the US to discriminate against a job candidate because they're married—we're not even allowed to ask—but it is completely legal to hire a cheaper candidate over a more expensive one. If department X already knows that you have a two-body problem, they also know that hiring you will be more expensive. The safest strategy is not to mention that your partner needs a position (or even that your partner is another academic) until an offer is on the table.


*When I originally posted this answer in 2012, this financial arrangement was de-facto permanent, but my university has recently refined its policies. As of June 2018, the joint funding arrangement is permanent (“recurring”) if Partner B has a tenure-track faculty position, and limited to three years otherwise.

  • 5
    Do you know if this practice is common outside of the US? This sounds like the sort of practice which could fall foul of employment regulations is the UK (and possibly the rest of Europe). – Mark Booth Sep 7 '12 at 9:33
  • How long is X required to pay part of B's salary? If it's indefinite I'd be concerned that it would make A more vulnerable to being laid off or given smaller than normal pay raises as a cost containment measure. – Dan Neely Nov 16 '12 at 19:17
  • 4
    @Mark, the idea of the "double body" accommodation was scolded upon by an ANZ university where both my wife and I interviewed. While lower tier US universities would have seen this as advantageous to hire Ph.D.s from good places, the ANZ university in question viewed this as a preferential treatment, and stepped out of communicating with us. So yes, probably in the UK academic context (which ANZ has inherited), this would not work well. – StasK Mar 4 '13 at 15:04
  • 1
    @StasK What's ANZ? Australia / New Zealand? – gerrit Mar 28 '13 at 16:58
  • 1
    @gerrit, yes; sorry, I thought it was a common enough abbreviation. – StasK Apr 2 '13 at 3:44
34

This is a very difficult, and unfortunately common problem. It is dealt with in many ways, including all of the ones you mention. Solving the problem almost always involves a serious compromise by one or both parties. Couples can take many approaches:

  1. Not compromise on their jobs: both take the best academic jobs they can find. This usually involves living apart, in different cities, sometimes for years. They end up with lots of frequent flyer miles.

  2. One becomes an academic, the other leaves academia: this makes it much easier to live together, but might require a major sacrifice by one of the couple, if they had their heart set on an academic career.

  3. Both compromise on placement quality: couples can commit to both finding academic jobs together. Since it is difficult to find two jobs at the same university, this often involves taking jobs at a lower ranked institution, or less desirable location than either could get on their own. Some universities specialize in recruiting couples: this can be a coup for the university, since they get two researchers who are both higher quality than they would normally be able to recruit.

A long (daily) commute for each person can represent an extremely successful outcome of type 1), or a less successful outcome of type 3). For example, it is possible (although grueling) for a couple to live in Princeton, and have one commute to Philadelphia and one commute to New York.

This is not to say that it is impossible to achieve perfect success: there are academic couples, both of whom are in the same department at the top university in their field. But this requires an extraordinary amount of both talent and luck.

  • Real-life example: one partner is in Norway, another partner - in the Netherlands... – Alexander Serebrenik Jul 26 '12 at 16:01
4

I have not performed a literature survey, but the only solution that looks viable is to choose a large and well-connected city like London with plenty of scope for both fields.

It is very common in India to find faculty couples, especially in the IITs. It is advantageous for the university as they are, in a way, settling the couple and ensuring their long-term stay.

  • 1
    I wish I could just choose a large and well-connected city like London, partner or no partner. But, since I'm not a rock-star researcher, I probably have a higher chance of finding an industry job in London than I do finding a faculty one. It might be viable (from vie - life; it has a potential to last if established), but it certainly doesn't sound very feasible (from faire, fais- - to do, to make; doesn't seem doable) or achievable in the first place. "Only job solution for academic couples are capitals (big cities) like London" sounds like a polite way to dissuade one from the idea. – penelope Nov 28 '18 at 18:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.