9

I worked on a proposal together with a coworker. The idea for the proposals came from industry and we all discussed this. There were 2 project and we all have inputs. My project was accepted and his was not. We all contributed ideas back and forth with the 2 projects.

I did put his name on the first draft proposal but left his name off the final version and put myself as sole PI. I did ask him for further corrections but his reply was that there was none. I simply forgot and left his name off without asking his permission. It was an oversight.

Now he saw this proposal and wants to report me for misconduct.

Is he right that he can report me for academic misconduct? Is this an ethical issue and not academic misconduct?

  • 12
    You started the question with 'Is it wrong for me to take a coworker's name off a proposal' and ended with 'I simply forgot and left his name off'. Those are too radically different things. – user-2147482637 May 8 '14 at 4:33
  • 8
    I'm interested in the notion that "Academic misconduct" and "an ethical issue" are two separate things. – Fomite May 8 '14 at 14:59
  • @mandysmith Please do not remove the content of the question. – ff524 May 11 '14 at 22:34
17

Your question as I understand it is: is it considered misconduct to exclude a co-author from a proposal, or is it some other ethical issue?

Certainly "research misconduct" can broadly be defined as "ethically problematic behaviors in research" - in which case there is no difference. However, let us assume a narrower definition of "misconduct."

The specific definition of "misconduct" may depend on where you are. In the United States, the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) defines "research misconduct" as follows:

Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results.

and "plagiarism" is further defined as

the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.

(Individual institutions may, and often do, extend this definition as a matter of internal policy. However, the ORI policy represents the least inclusive definition of misconduct in the United States.)

According to this definition, it seems that using your coworker's ideas, processes, results, or words in your research proposal without giving him credit is academic misconduct.

Having said that, the ORI also says this on plagiarism:

Many allegations of plagiarism involve disputes among former collaborators who participated jointly in the development or conduct of a research project, but who subsequently went their separate ways and made independent use of the jointly developed concepts, methods, descriptive language, or other product of the joint effort. The ownership of the intellectual property in many such situations is seldom clear, and the collaborative history among the scientists often supports a presumption of implied consent to use the products of the collaboration by any of the former collaborators.

For this reason, ORI considers many such disputes to be authorship or credit disputes rather than plagiarism. Such disputes are referred to PHS agencies and extramural institutions for resolution.

From your description, however, it seems that this is not the case in your scenario - you and your coworker did not "go separate ways." There is no "implied consent" to use his ideas. He fully expected to be a co-author, and you yourself admit that he should have been a co-author, except that you somehow left him off.

(Even if this is considered an "authorship dispute" and not "plagiarism," it's not up to you to make that determination - it's up to the investigative body, who will look into the matter if your coworker chooses to report this.)

Finally, "honest error" is not considered misconduct according to the ORI. However, your coworker is not required to take your word for it that your exclusion of him from the proposal was an honest error. This is a determination that a third-party investigative body will typically make.

In summary: Your coworker is well within his rights to report you for misconduct. If he does so, you are free to try and persuade the investigators that this was an honest mistake.

protected by aeismail May 12 '14 at 4:21

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.