This is the first time I am writing here and I hope not to be very repetitive with regards to similar topics already covered, so I will try to be as much specific as I can. Before all, I am an undergraduate in physics and I have an institutional email.

Some days ago I uploaded a paper related to the field of Number Theory. Specifically, trying to provide a solution to Riemann Hypothesis. The paper is well-structured, with neutral tone and using Lyx-AMS template. It has its references and I am solely the author of the paper.

As it may occur, my paper was rejected with the standard sentence "Our moderators determined that your submission does not contain sufficient original or substantive scholarly research and is not of interest to arXiv".

Then I appealed and I am waiting for a final decision but, according to other users' experiences I have been look at, it does not seem to be very likely to be succesful. The thing is that I have a real conviction that my paper could represent something important to this topic, and I have been looking around and I have the following options:

  1. I remain quiet and wait for their final answer without doing anything else.
  2. I start looking for new ways to let my paper be known to some scientific community in the area of Number Theory. That includes to submit to other journals, in which case, should I choose first conventional journals (any of them that I could manage to submit to) or pre-prints repository (and which ones would you recommend?
  3. Should I talk to someone from the area to get an overview of the paper if worth it (a bit risky)?

If the paper is wrong, I want to make sure that this is the case and that, therefore, could not go all along.

I thank you in advance for your constructive answers.

  • 2
    "If the paper is wrong, I want to make sure that this is the case and that, therefore, could not go all along." It's not clear what you are trying to say here ("could not go all along"). Also, it's not clear whether you are actually claiming to have proved the RH in the manuscript or not. Commented Oct 10, 2023 at 11:15
  • 3
    Also read Terry Tao's advice on this topic: terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/…
    – academic
    Commented Oct 10, 2023 at 11:49
  • 5
    "no feedback is usually provided bu arXiv)." You already got the feedback - "your submission does not contain sufficient original or substantive scholarly research and is not of interest to arXiv ."
    – Nobody
    Commented Oct 10, 2023 at 12:16
  • 14
    On the balance of probabilities, given the fact that you're a physics undergrad and that you yourself do not seem to be entirely sure whether or not your proof is valid, my best guess as to what's really happening here is that you don't yet have a solid grasp on the "rules" of mathematics and on what constitutes valid proof in mathematics. This is not meant as an insult: I do not think there's anything to be ashamed of if it turns out that a physics undergrad does not yet have an entirely solid grasp on how things are proved in mathematics. Commented Oct 10, 2023 at 12:20
  • 21
    @MiguelSeisdedosGarcía You are an undergraduate, presumably without extensive math background, claiming to have proved the most famous open problem in the entire subject. I'm afraid that no one outside your university will believe your claims, take you seriously, or read your paper. Seek mentorship where you are, from faculty at your own university. I recommend that you approach them with humility: you are sure that your paper must be wrong somehow, but you can't figure out why. Good luck.
    – academic
    Commented Oct 10, 2023 at 12:31

1 Answer 1


EDIT: This answer is wrong for the specific mathematical problem under discussion (RH hypothesis).

It seems you are doing your work without any affiliation, and that you are ready to invest time & money on it.

Look for a suitable conference close to you (close as in geogrpahically and regarding the topic), send a contribution (I would suggest a poster contribution), upon acceptance explain briefly your situation to the conference organizers (briefly as "I have no money, no funds, I am a young scholar and I would like to share some results with the community").

Good luck and do not be take down by the arXiv rejection. Editors and curators work on a voluntary basis, they may be a bit uptight with respect to unaffiliated unknown researchers, you may have better luck with local/national mathematics venues.

  • Thank you for your answer. I am undergraduate in physics and I have institutional email (I also hold a bachelor's and master's degrees in areas not related to the topic). I have been diving into this topic profoundly and I think the paper worth it. Commented Oct 10, 2023 at 11:18
  • please add the information "I am an undergraduate in physics and I have an institutional email" to the question., Do you expect that the paper is not desk-rejected because of that? add that information as well.
    – EarlGrey
    Commented Oct 10, 2023 at 11:22
  • In principle, authority principle is a sin in science, but unknown authors without traceable publication track in a certain topic are usually facing an uphill struggle to publish their first paper. On a parallel note, can you give the name of 5 possible reviewers of your paper? If you are not able, it may be true you miss some of the people working on the topic and/or the latest advancements on the topic.
    – EarlGrey
    Commented Oct 10, 2023 at 11:24
  • 13
    Please do not encourage people to submit their "proofs of the Riemann hypothesis" to conferences. Firstly, it wastes people's time. Secondly, the answer that the OP is going to get will not be any more encouraging that the answer they got from the arXiv. Thirdly, it encourages the OP to believe that they may have actually proved the RH. Commented Oct 10, 2023 at 11:59
  • 10
    This answer is wrong, for mathematics-specific reasons. Replace "Riemann Hypothesis" with a more modest claim, and I would agree, but a claim to have proved RH will (I'm sorry to say) be instantly dismissed by any mathematician.
    – academic
    Commented Oct 10, 2023 at 12:35

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .