I submitted my research article in mathematics (number theory category) on Thursday. It has been seven days since my paper status was "on hold". I have submitted several papers before, but this time it took a long time.

I always submit my articles from my supervisor's account (through cross-connection), since I don't have an arXiv account. But I have not seen so much in my previous six articles.

Why is arXiv not taking action further? Should I contact arXiv about the delay?

  • I am not sure, but I think that the arxiv email response always gives a reason why the paper is on hold. Which reason was could well be that action on your side is needed.
    – Dirk
    Jun 3 at 14:46

2 Answers 2


Since mid-2022, ArXiv takes longer to make papers public. The reasons were not explained. Perhaps, it has something to do with a large number of papers written in relation to Covid-19, and the fact that some preprints were used as "scientific evidence" in public/political discourse before the results were peer-reviewed and "officially" published.

At the moment, it is quite normal for a preprint to be on hold in ArXiv for 2+ weeks. Sit tight and wait patiently.

  • 2
    Thank you very much for the recent information. I was not aware of it.
    – learner
    Jun 1 at 10:21
  • 15
    That's interesting, but definitely not normal in my arXiv categories.
    – innisfree
    Jun 1 at 10:32
  • 1
    I don't think this is accurate for OP, who specified math.NT. All the preprints in that category in today's (June 2) release were submitted either on June 1 or late on May 31. Jun 2 at 7:54
  • 1
    @learner I had a quick look at math.DG and papers don't seem to take noticeably longer than for math.NT. Jun 2 at 13:12
  • 1
    Your information seems correct. Finally, arXiv accepted the paper on 13th day from submission. i.e., within 2 weeks
    – learner
    Jun 6 at 3:27

Let me tell you that I always submit my articles from my supervisor's account

This doesn't sound like a good idea. I can't remember the exact rules regarding submission, but why can't your supervisor endorse you to submit to your chosen arXiv category?

Why is Arxiv not taking action further?

Who knows why.

Should I contact Arxiv about the delay?

If you want to know why, then yes. They may also be able to advise you about how your advisor can endorse you so that you can handle the submissions properly.

  • 4
    Indeed, my supervisor is always a coauthor, so I submit from his account. He can not endorse me in "number theory" category because he has different "default" category. Thank you for answer.
    – learner
    Jun 1 at 10:20
  • @learner AFAIK categories one can endorse depends on whether one has published in those categories, it doesn't have to be the default category
    – GoodDeeds
    Jun 2 at 5:24
  • @GoodDeeds: Presumably by "published in those categories" you mean archiving something in ArXiv in those categories? My understanding is that regardless of how much one has formally published (peer review journals), someone without an institutional address requires endorsement even for acceptance in categories one has formally published in. Jun 2 at 9:35
  • @DaveLRenfro Yes, that is what I meant (archiving on arXiv in those categories), sorry for the confusion.
    – GoodDeeds
    Jun 2 at 12:32
  • 1
    @learner I am not sure that is how it works, according to info.arxiv.org/help/endorsement.html, the number of submissions needed to have been authored varies by subject but only requires that they have been submitted to arXiv, with no requirement of journal or other publications.
    – GoodDeeds
    Jun 2 at 13:16

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .