As the profile indicates, my name is Max Muller. I've recently started working on a dual PhD on process mining and natural language processing at a university and a governmental institution in the Netherlands.
According to this overview, the surname Muller (or variations thereof, including Müller and Mulder) is the 5th most popular surname in Austria, the (single) most popular one in Germany, the second most common one in Luxembourg, the 10th most common surname in the Netherlands, and the single most popular one in Switzerland.
In other words, there are a lot of Mullers in Northwestern and Central Europe. Moreover, the first name 'Max' is quite popular as well, and the combination 'Max Muller' is pretty widespread too.
Although I don't think there's much wrong with the name itself, I am slightly worried people won't be able to find my (hopefully upcoming) research articles on repositories like the ArXiv, Google Scholar, ResearchGate and similar venues.
Therefore, I currently consider adding a pseudonym to my full name, and use the combination as a profile name on these websites. This could help make me and the papers more easily identifiable. In my case, I'd like to add the name Lonysa, a pseudonym I've thought up years ago. It's also the name of my website. So the full name would become 'Max Lonysa Muller' or 'Max Muller Lonysa'.
My full name is Maximiliaan Alexander Muller, so I could also consider using the name Max A. Muller or something along those lines (as suggested in the answers to this question), but I'm not sure that would help in this case, given there are so many Max Mullers who might have done something similar to their academic names.
I have the following questions:
- Is it generally a good idea to add a pseudonym, and the aforementioned one in particular, to your full name on venues for scientific articles in order to make yourself more easily identifiable? Why or why not?
- Are there other ways to distinguish yourself from people who bear the same name as you?