Imagine you have a paper that got rejected from a top tier conference. You think it is of high quality.
Do you submit the paper to arXiv, or keep pushing for a conference later on?
Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
Submitting a paper to the arXiv does not preclude publishing it later in a journal or in the proceedings of a conference. In fact, one should not think of a paper which appears on the arXiv as being published. (There's no peer review, for one thing.)
In my community (
hep-th, mostly) one always submits to the arXiv first, gathers comments, and only then submits for publication. Of course, other communities might work differently.
In the fields I am familiar with (maths and physics, mostly), I would submit the paper to the arXiv in any case. You can then decide how to actually publish the paper.