So I've recently graduated with a STEM degree, but my advisor still wants us to make a submission to a conference.

Right now I am unemployed and I have no source of income.

What is the best way going about telling my advisor that I would like to be paid?

  • 9
    Graduated from what? What is the amount of labor? I am all for getting paid, but it's not clear if he wants you to whip up an abstract (a few hours) or weeks of work. Commented Sep 1, 2022 at 4:53
  • 7
    What is your career plan? If you intend to stay in academia or do R&D in industry, this would be a valuable investment of your time and your adviser would be doing you a favor (as long as you are listed as an author). It could even help finding you a job as it gets your name out there. I've seen slides in presentations saying that the presenter or a co-author is looking for a post-doc position.
    – user9482
    Commented Sep 1, 2022 at 5:07
  • 5
    Sounds to me like if you say no (or if you demand payment and the advisor doesn't have the funds to provide it) then the paper will not be published, which could hurt you (+ the research community) more than anyone else.
    – Allure
    Commented Sep 1, 2022 at 5:08
  • 3
    If the work was done as part of your thesis, your advisor (+university) has 'paid'. You can't hold the university/advisor to 'ransom'. Commented Sep 1, 2022 at 5:17
  • 4
    Who is going to pay for the conference travel? Will the trip stop you from looking for work? Are you looking for work involving research such as an academic job? It is really hard to answer this without some detail. Commented Sep 1, 2022 at 17:15

3 Answers 3


I've been in similar situations, both from your perspective and from the other side, eg. collaborating with people no longer employed in my research group.

The common mindset of people in academia is that they are happy to get publications. Depending on your field, it is also not unheard of for people to pay for publications. So I'm pretty sure that the way your previous supervisor sees this is that they are offering you an opportunity to get a publication. You didn't state it in the question, but usually when people ask previous collaborators for such things, it is implied that the previous collaborator will have to do minimal work. So in this sense, such an offer is indeed very generous from an academic point of view.

Of course it is up to you how you view the situation. If you think that you would not benefit from the publication personally, then it's completely fine to say no. However I don't think you can expect to be paid, I've never heard of such an arrangement.

  • 2
    While it would be unusual to "pay for a paper", it is not unusual for undergraduates to be hired by a lab post-graduation or for PhD graduates to be paid as a post doc for 6 mos - 1 year after graduation, specifically to wrap up projects they were previously working on and transition to their next position. Of course, the availability of funds for those sorts of roles depends a lot on the specific field and how research is paid for.
    – Bryan Krause
    Commented Sep 1, 2022 at 16:42

It really depends most on Roland's question of what is your career plan. If you don't want to stay in academia, there might be no reason to do this, and you should simply explain. If you want to stay in academia, doing this will likely make it easier for you to find a job, so you should try to find a way to do this that you are happy with.

I would consider saying something along the lines of

"I don't think I will have time to work on this conference submission because I am currently very hard at work looking for jobs."

The idea is to not accuse them of trying to exploit you for free work (as Szgoger suggests, there is a good chance they thought they were helping you out by offering you this opportunity, and might be offended by such an accusation) but still let them know about your job situation and connect it to the paper. This assumes that, if they have some opportunity to, e.g. take you on as a temporary postdoc, as Bryan Krause suggests, you would want to take it and then work on the paper.

  • 2
    I would add that if the person going to a conference is unemployed, it is important that every expense is covered. Of course, from the post it is not clear who is attending the conference. Commented Sep 1, 2022 at 18:15
  • "might be offended by such an accusation" in fact they would, because they are taking for granted that the (ex)student will work for free. I agree with you, better take another angle to the refusal, it takes a lot of efforts to make them realize the work-for-free aspect, because they went through that "experience" and they expect it to be a formative part of being a researcher and a "test" for the motivation of someone of being a researcher ... so much crap in the system ...
    – EarlGrey
    Commented Sep 2, 2022 at 5:57

This is an exemplary case of academia asking "innocently" for some free work.

Please keep in mind that by asking money, or at least refund of the living expenses you will have, you will be looked like a jerk by the median academic person ("what? this person wants to be paid to do research? how they dare.") while in fact it's the person proposing free work that's the jerk.

Yes, if you do that work you will obtain visbility and it will help to build your resume.

If you want to stay in good terms, ask if they will pay you the travel and accomodation to the conference (hoping they will hold true if they say "yes"). This is not payment for the work you do now, but it is at least a tangible and concrete form of future compensation for the work performed now.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .