I have written a manuscript and want some feedback from experts. So I sent emails to different professors to ask their permission if they want to view my manuscript. I did not attach my manuscript to my email. Would it be considered spam? Would it ruin my reputation?

  • 8
    Are you an independent researcher or associated with an institution? Do these people know you? I expect that your emails get ignored and tomorrow nobody will remember receiving them.
    – user9482
    Commented Aug 11, 2022 at 11:56
  • 1
    I have an institutional email address, but none of these people know me. I guess at least my reputation won't be ruined because my email gets ignored.
    – Ken.Wong
    Commented Aug 11, 2022 at 12:03
  • 1
    My own opinion is that this not spam. However, some may view it as "quasi-spam". Sometimes you can get a friend to go over things like basic grammar and spelling so that you send a high-quality document out, if that's what you intend to do. Commented Aug 11, 2022 at 13:18

2 Answers 2


How are you going about it?

If you blast a generic email to 100 groups that are approximately in your subfield, I would not expect a great outcome. Most people will ignore it; a few might be annoyed, especially if a) they perceive the paper as low quality or irrelevant to their work or b) multiple people realize they received the same email. I doubt this will have severe, longterm consequences, but it certainly wouldn't help.

On the other hand, you could certainly send a few targeted emails asking for feedback. This will work best if you identify people who are very likely to be interested in your work and explain why in your initial email. The authors cited in your paper might be a good place to start. I would consider asking a grad student or postdocs as well; I think you're more likely to get a response and it may be more in-depth too! It wouldn't hurt to ask for feedback on specific parts of the paper too. For example, I think an email like this would work reasonably well:

Dear Dr. Eisenhardt,

I am Ignus Ignatius, a 5th year PhD student in Dr. Xavier's group at State University. I enjoyed your 2008 paper about color matching in very young children. We adapted that paradigm to study color preferences in baboons and have collected some data demonstrating that they, like humans, have color preferences that vary throughout their lifespan. I'm currently writing this data up for the Example Journal, and would appreciate any feedback you might have.

Our preprint is here [link to reputable preprint server/website]. I am also presenting this work at next month's Hypothetical Research Conference in Springfield.

I would be particularly interested to know whether you think we have correctly controlled for interactions between colors' hue and saturation, as I know that was a focus of your followup work. We would be happy to recognize your feedback in the Acknowledgements of our next version.

Thank you!

-- Ignus Ignatius

If your field uses them, I would consider posting the manuscript to a preprint server, rather than attaching it directly. This sidesteps @NuclearHogie's concern about security, expands the potential pool of readers, and prevents anyone from "scooping" you. One potential downside of this approach is that if you solicit comments from someone, you should acknowledge their efforts somehow (formal acknowledgement, or even coauthorship), and doing so will likely preclude them from serving as a peer reviewer. Good luck!


This might be considered spam, but it might also be considered okay, especially if you have worked with a mentor or advisor to get your paper into excellent shape first. When I was a grad student, my advisor encouraged me to send a copy of my first paper to researchers whom I didn't know. (My advisor did know them.) More recently I have received, and replied to, emails with unsolicited manuscripts from student researchers.

If you go this route, I'd recommend that you (1) make sure your paper is immaculate, and typeset in the same way as other papers in your field, (2) have it read by someone at your home institution first; (3) attach your manuscript with your initial email; (4) be happy if you get one reply, and don't expect a longer back-and-forth.

If you are claiming a solution to a famous open problem, then your claim is very unlikely to be believed and your paper probably won't be read. If your paper is on a niche problem in an active area of research, you are more likely to be taken seriously.

Above all, accept that these professors don't have any obligation to you. Some might write back, but they're not being rude if they don't, so don't send any follow-up or reminder emails.

  • 1
    So I should attach my manuscript to the first email I sent to those professors?
    – Ken.Wong
    Commented Aug 11, 2022 at 13:23
  • 3
    Yes. What you're hoping will happen is that the professor will note your email, cycle back around to it when they have a lull in their other work, take a quick read and write back immediately after that.
    – academic
    Commented Aug 11, 2022 at 13:48
  • 2
    @academic I disagree that the manuscript should be attached to the first email - it's cybersecurity 101 to never open attachments from an unknown source. In my view, an email from someone I've never heard of looks even more like spam with an attachment than without one. I would be very surprised if someone's initial response to an unsolicited email was to provide a useful review, without any preliminary follow-up or initiating a dialogue. Commented Aug 11, 2022 at 18:25
  • 2
    And this is a case where a good abstract is crucial, as it should not only communicate what the paper is about, but tell the recipient whether they would want to read it. And the abstract should probably be included in the actual text of the email, rather than an attachment. If it's too long to fit in the email, then it's too long to be an abstract. Commented Aug 13, 2022 at 4:54

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .