I submitted a paper to an internationally reputed journal. Two months after submission I was asked to suggest possible reviewers, which I did after a couple of days reflection. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still "awaiting reviewer invitation." I sent an email to the editor-in-chief as this was the only contact information given for queries. It has been almost two weeks without any reply. The day before yesterday I emailed the managing editor to know if the paper is under review or still awaiting reviewer invitation, but still I have received no reply from either editor.

How should I get in contact with the journal regarding my paper's review status?

  • 5
    What's your field? This is relevant information. For some fields like math, 6 months is normal. You just sent an e-mail to the managing editor two days ago. Wait a few weeks before further action.
    – Nobody
    Commented Mar 26, 2014 at 2:20
  • 1
    After you already waited for so long, you might wait a little longer. Your field would help to compare, and possibly what kind of publication (full paper, short commun, rev.,...) Commented Mar 26, 2014 at 10:47
  • 3
    @scaaahu Six months is normal to even find somebody who'll agree to review? I'm not surprised by six months to get the actual review back (that would be pretty normal in theoretical computer science, too) but six months passing without the review process even starting seems excessive. Commented Apr 29, 2014 at 11:11
  • @DavidRicherby I have no idea what happened to the review of the OP's paper. All I know is that some journals in some fields are notoriously slow responsive. That's why I asked the question. The OP has not come back here since he asked the question. Hopefully he's got some response from the journal.
    – Nobody
    Commented Apr 29, 2014 at 11:53

3 Answers 3


If you feel your paper is strong, then I would send one last e-mail in a week or so stating that if there is no response, you will be compelled to withdraw from that journal and resubmit at their leading competitor.

Note that sometimes the e-mail queues at journals are broken. If you can find an alternate way to contact the editor, you may want to try it.


. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'.

I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! If true that is indeed problematic: six months is waaaaaay too long to wait for this.

I have two plausible guesses as to what has happened to you.

1) They are having a lot of trouble finding a suitable referee. They tried on their own, failed, then asked you for help after two months (kind of a long time, but not a priori unreasonable). The people that you suggested somehow didn't pan out, and they reacted badly to that, putting your work on some sort of long-term queue.

2) Whatever electronic system is conveying to you the message "awaiting reviewer invitation" is simply malfunctioning. Possibly (as @RoboKaren suggests) the journal's email system is on the fritz as well. If that's the case, who knows what's actually happening: maybe your paper has gotten lost entirely. (Almost anything can happen. Once, almost ten years ago, when I inquired after a few months on the status of my paper, the answer was "We're having trouble finding any record of your submission. Are you sure you submitted to our journal?" This may be hard to believe, but...eventually we sorted it out -- in particular, they found the record of my submission! -- and the paper was published by that journal.) Or maybe the referee report is actually in and it is just the part of the system where they tell you this that is malfunctioning. (That also happened to me, much more recently, and again the paper was eventually published, although this time I am less thrilled with the journal and will probably not submit there again.)

Either way, you need to actually get in contact with an editor of the journal and find out what happened. Not responding to your emails at all within two weeks is certainly unacceptable behavior: every professional deserves to be treated better than this. In my opinion this total lack of response empowers you to take more vigorous steps to contact the editors of the journal. Such things include, in roughly increasing order of vigorousness:

A. Emailing the editors at their university accounts rather than the journal account.
(This is definitely the least intrusive: try this first.)
B. Sending multiple emails at the rate of one a day.
C. Calling the editors at any phone number they list on a professional webpage.
D. Enlisting a more famous / senior / powerful ally to try to contact the editor on your behalf.
E. Contacting other professionals to tell them that you must get in touch with Editor X and can't, e.g. the secretary of Editor X's home department, or the head of Editor X's home department.

I would not: contact an editor on a social media site like facebook, try to look up their home phone number or address, or anything like that. I think that's too much.

Once you do hear from an editor, find out how far off the rails your train actually is. After losing contact with you completely and advertising your paper as "awaiting reviewer invitation" after six months, in my view the editors should be apologizing and telling you what they're going to do to fix the situation. If you get the sense that they don't see it that way, it's definitely time to try again with a different journal.


Awaiting review invitation means "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: Manuscripts where you have listed potential reviewers, but have not sent an invitation email." (as the associate editor)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .