3

I am a math postdoc who defended his Ph.D. two years ago. I have been working on a project with some senior mathematician for 1.5 years. I also invited him to the university where I am affiliated for two weeks. We finished some preliminary versions of a paper, and then he told me he will send the complete version by June. After some time, he dropped an email to me that our technique works for a more general version which is why he was rewriting the paper. Then, I got another email from him that he was slow and asked me to extend something to a more general case. I sent him the extension, which was not complete as I was not not sure about some minor problems, but he hasn't replied to my email yet.

I told him some months ago that I am going to apply for some grant which is why we need to put the paper on arXiv, and he said "sure, I understand you". But, now, there is no news.

Question

I want to send an email and ask how the project is going on, but I am ashamed to ask as he does most of the project. On the other hand, I need to put this paper on arXiv because of the grant proposal. As I said, I want to send an email to him, but I am scared he tells me "what you did and why you expect to finish soon".

Remark

It is too late to finish the project myself as he changed most settings, so it takes a lot of time.

16
  • what impact will have on the grant comitee an arXiv paper instead of a paper that is mentioned as "under preparation"?
    – EarlGrey
    May 20 at 21:25
  • 5
    @EarlGrey: Paper published means referee(s) did not find errors, paper in arXiv means you see no errors, paper in preparation means "there might be fatal errors". See the difference?
    – markvs
    May 21 at 7:22
  • 5
    "In preparation" sometimes means "will never be finished". I would guess that "in preparation" will count much less than preprint.
    – Dirk
    May 21 at 11:08
  • Ever heard about this thing called a phone and having a conversation with him about it? Talking helps. May 21 at 12:20
  • 1
    With respect to possibility of getting the grant. If I get a proposal which lists papers in preparation, I automatically reject it,
    – markvs
    May 21 at 23:34

3 Answers 3

4

Why not going back to the very specific case, put that one in arXiv and then work with the needed time/effort toward the more general case? This way you put some pressure on him to finish the most general case, before someone else extend your arXiv paper.

6
  • Thank you very much for your answer. What exactly I should tell him?
    – Adam
    May 20 at 17:35
  • 1
    "Dear X., I am going to apply for some grant, I need to have a referrable proof that I am working on topic Y, so I will put a reduced version of the paper on arxiv, presenting the solution for the specific case. Do you agree on being co-author? Best regards, "
    – EarlGrey
    May 20 at 21:25
  • I agree this is the best solution in this situation
    – MAS
    May 22 at 3:24
  • @EarlGrey : Isn't it rude to write the last sentence? Definitely, he is a co-author as he does the most things.
    – Adam
    May 23 at 14:09
  • @EarlGrey : Do you think that he will tell me e "what you did and why you expect to finish soon"/
    – Adam
    May 23 at 14:16
1

“Hi, just a quick reminder, I was hoping to put a version of our paper on the arxiv by DATE, before I apply for GRANT. Any chance you think you might have a draft we could upload by then? If not, could we put up the previous version for now, just so I can refer to something publicly available in my proposal? We can always add the new version later. Thanks very much”

2
  • "could we put up the previous version for now," If uploaded to arXiv, it is up forever, not just for now.
    – EarlGrey
    May 23 at 12:11
  • Literally the next sentence: “We can always add the new version later.” People add preliminary versions all the time. Sometimes you have multiple drafts, with even significant rewrites. If it’s majorly different, they can even add it as a separate submission.
    – Skeptic
    May 23 at 12:13
-4

Strictly speaking, if you are a co-author of the work, you are welcome to submit it yourself. However note that bell "cannot be unrung", so once it's announced it cannot be completely removed.

7
  • 2
    It's very important to have consent from all coauthors before doing this; you cannot just submit it yourself without their permission.
    – Bryan Krause
    May 23 at 16:19
  • Important and ethical? Yes. Legally speaking? It's not required if you're a co-author of the work.
    – Jake
    May 24 at 19:03
  • Curious what legal doctrine you are working under; I don't know that it is illegal anywhere, but I would be very hesitant to claim it's legal everywhere...
    – Bryan Krause
    May 24 at 19:35
  • US Copyright Law. Under normal circumstances, any full author would have the legal authority to grant one of the available licenses in arXiv. In general, if you're an author of the work, legally speaking, you would have the authority to grant the license. Ethically? No, you need to have permission.
    – Jake
    May 24 at 20:12
  • US copyright law tends not to matter outside the US.
    – Bryan Krause
    May 24 at 20:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .