3

The arXiv is for preprints, but may also be used to disseminate reprints.

What considerations bear upon the advisability of putting a reprint from the American Mathematical Monthly there? In particular:

  • Is it permissible under copyright law and might that depend on how long it's been since publication? Monthly articles of a certain age (three years or more maybe?) are available through jstor(dot)org, I presume with the consent of whoever owns the rights, so I would guess that after that time it is permissible?

  • Does it get substantially more attention for the article than it gets from jstor(dot)org and from library subscriptions to the Monthly and from other subscriptions? Here it seems that anyone with internet access can see it, whereas with jstor(dot)org you need an account on the web site of a library that subscribes. One could post a link to it here.

Improve this question
5
  • IANAL but I am pretty sure that would violate copyright. An article in the Monthly will be found as easily there legally as on arXiv by any reasonable search strategy. There are probably workarounds for folks who don't have access to jstor. This is not one.
    – Ethan Bolker
    Commented Dec 26, 2021 at 2:52
  • 3
    Whether it’s permitted or not would depend on what the copyright transfer form you sign says.
    – Dan Romik
    Commented Dec 26, 2021 at 2:53
  • @EthanBolker : Whether it would violate copyright would depend on whether the Monthly has a policy of permitting such things.
    – Michael Hardy
    Commented Dec 26, 2021 at 3:02
  • Policies vary by journal and some let you pick among different policies for a fee.
    – Anonymous Physicist
    Commented Dec 26, 2021 at 15:13
  • I now have an email from the Editor-Elect saying she will check with the Managing Editor and Publishing Manager who are out until January 3.
    – Michael Hardy
    Commented Dec 29, 2021 at 18:37

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
8

The Monthly's information for authors links to Taylor and Francis's general policy on this point. If by "reprint" you mean the VOR (version of record) then no you can't post it to the arxiv. You can, however, post the AOM (author original manuscript) to the arxiv.

Improve this answer
11
  • I was not aware until after I posted this that a commercial publisher owned the rights to this. Some mathematicians have realized that certain conflicts between the interests of commercial publishers and those of academia make it better to do things in other ways that that, and so it seems to me one should be wary of such an arrangement. Seemingly few mathematicians have realized this is part of a broader problem of certain kinds of corruption in academia. One other small symptom is the widespread practice of . . . . . .
    – Michael Hardy
    Commented Dec 29, 2021 at 18:41
  • . . . . encouraging vast numbers of students to take calculus who have earned good grades in the prerequisite course but who are known not to have understood the prerequisite subject matter in a way that is needed to learn first-year calculus in the way contemplated by textbooks and curricula. Instead they just learn algorithms like (d/dx)x^n = nx^{n-1} without ever suspecting that learning mathematics consists of something other than learning to apply memorized algorithms. Mathematicians see that that is all they learn and attribute it to an unfortunate lack of . . . . . . . .
    – Michael Hardy
    Commented Dec 29, 2021 at 18:45
  • . . . . . . ability of most of the students, but seemingly fail to see that the system encourages lack of ability because it is a good strategy for doing what the students want to do, which is not learning the subject, but getting grades. A few places like the University of Toronto and Macalester College and some of the liberal arts colleges in western Massachusetts are dealing with this issue to some extent. but many many professors of mathematics are blind to it. And probably some want to keep it that way just to rake in paychecks for phony teaching. And some administrators . . . . . .
    – Michael Hardy
    Commented Dec 29, 2021 at 18:49
  • It’s owned by the MAA who contracts to Taylor and Francis for publishing. Acta and Compositio have similar arrangements. This is much better than it being owned by a publisher.
    – Noah Snyder
    Commented Dec 29, 2021 at 18:49
  • . . . . . want to keep it that way in order to rake in the tuition money.
    – Michael Hardy
    Commented Dec 29, 2021 at 18:49

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .