I read some questions on this platform and found that arXiv does not review research as in one of the questions here. Does this mean that the only obstacle to publishing the paper is endorsement only

  • Posting on arXiv is not publishing. You need to submit the paper to a journal and go through peer review to be published. Nov 9, 2021 at 13:00
  • @astronat I know of course Nov 9, 2021 at 20:05

1 Answer 1


Not exactly. There is a moderation process to weed out fakery and nonsense. It isn’t a full review though.

  • 8
    And as a preprint service, at least some of us don't consider uploading to arxiv as 'publishing'...
    – Jon Custer
    Nov 8, 2021 at 17:10
  • 4
    no, you 'acquire' copyright when you create the document.
    – Jon Custer
    Nov 8, 2021 at 17:31
  • 1
    If somebody hacks your computer and steals your unpublished great American novel and proceeds to publish it, well, they have violated your copyright and will be found liable. You take a (film) picture and have not developed it yet - you own the copyright regardless.
    – Jon Custer
    Nov 8, 2021 at 17:37
  • @DanRomik, a poor choice of words, I'll admit. But putting something on arXiv is publishing by the most common definition of the word (making generally available). It also supports a claim of priority (potentially) and gives you a way to defend against copyright infringement. That was my intention.
    – Buffy
    Nov 8, 2021 at 21:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .