I am wondering if anyone knows, thinks or has measured whether putting a paper on arXiv before submitting to a journal has any impact on the paper reviewing process and on it being accepted or rejected?
I do know why to put it on arXiv. There are plenty of reasons for that and it has been discussed exhaustively here and elsewhere in academia. This question is not about that.
I know that journals have different policies about this. I read them, I checked them, I am fine there as well. This question is not about that either.
My question is whether, in practice, there is a known impact or can anyone speculate if publishing to arXiv has a positive or negative effect. For instance, the editor/reviewers can see the paper in the arXiv and can have a different position about it; some people might have experiences relating to that from the point of view of reviewer/editor/submitter.
It would also be very interesting to see statistics showing whether the reviewing process for random sets of manuscript submissions with and without preprint versions differ, but I would guess those do not exist yet.