If papers were posted on the arXiv before submission then I argue it would be easier to branch out. I also think it would increase the quality of submissions and the speed of progress. Overall, it should benefit your community and so, albeit indirectly, yourself.
I quote from this blog post an illustration.
The current system reinforces the partition of research into
(sub)areas, making it hard for an outsider to leave their own. Of
course, it is good to have a domain of expertise and produce deep
results in it. Still, I think it would be better if it was a little
easier to work in different areas.
To illustrate the difficulty, suppose you want to start working in
new, hot area X. To learn the background, typically you have to read
papers. However, for every paper that you read, it is not uncommon
that there is another one which is or was under submission. Indeed,
the community is producing great results the majority of which is
rejected due to capacity constraints. So unless these works are on
electronic archives such as the arXiv, you don’t have access to them.
Who does? The experts of area X, to whom these papers are sent so that
they can be properly evaluated. But it may be hard for reviewers to
ignore submissions until publication. Suppose for example you have
been working on problem Y for months and now you are asked to review a
paper that solves Y. Are you going to ignore this information and keep
working on Y despite knowing that you will be beaten? Also, when the
paper does come out you’ve had a long time to internalize its
The edge currently given to an insider over an outsider is months if
the paper is accepted right away; it may be years otherwise.