On the one hand, it seems like a preprint can discourage dishonest reviewers or editors (who get to see new work before anyone else) from running off with ideas since you have proof of originality with a preprint. On the other hand, a preprint puts the ideas out there to the world at large. What do you think is the safest approach, submitting to journals with or without a preprint?

  • 1
    Assuming you are dishonest person, I'd advise that the vast majority of what's posted on ArXiv or in journals is simply not worth scooping. Scooping is not something one really needs to worry about in practice. Apr 26, 2021 at 1:11
  • It may allow others to start to build on your work earlier. It depends on you whether that is a good thing or not. Is it a low-hanging fruit that still needs some milking? Or are just afraid of loosing the priority for your current work? Apr 26, 2021 at 9:46

1 Answer 1


Preprint services prevent scooping.

Every preprint service puts a date stamp on every document that is published there (and in many cases a DOI as well). That's an effectively unmodifiable record of the time when something went live, at which point nobody can republish your result elsewhere with an earlier date stamp with any reputable publisher.

That said, preprints will not prevent competition for the generation of follow-on research based on a result, nor will it prevent somebody from claiming independent discovery of the same result. Those, however, are just a normal part of doing business in science.

  • ChemRxiv does assign DOIs
    – Raphaël
    Apr 25, 2021 at 20:51
  • @FedericoPoloni You're right; I'd forgotten that for arXiv the DOI comes from the journal later. bioRxiv assigns the DOI immediately, as do all of the others I've recently interacted with.
    – jakebeal
    Apr 26, 2021 at 0:55
  • 2
    If I submitted a paper to arxiv, and it produced tons of follow-on research that cited my paper, I would be generally quite pleased.
    – puppetsock
    Apr 26, 2021 at 14:29
  • @puppetsock Typically yes! Some people are much more fearful or greedy, e.g., believing that a particular paper opens up a lot of "low hanging fruit" results that they want to gather themselves as well. I believe that such views are typically short-sighted, but I can see how people come to hold them.
    – jakebeal
    May 15, 2021 at 11:22

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .