1

I am starting to look for postdoc (I am at the end of my 3rd year of PhD, my PhD is a 3 year long and I will finish in october) and I currently only have 1 co-author publication (on a good journal), and 1 still on arxiv on which I am first author.

In the meantime we are writing 2 papers on which I am first author.

However I am worried that as "in practice" I only have one paper in a peer reviewed journal the post-doc advisor might not be super interested in my profile. Indeed it is "easy" to say "look there is another on arxiv and other in preparations". Because as long as it is not peer reviewed it could be something of poor quality in people mind.

My question is then: on my CV I wrote "in preparation" for those two other papers. But isn't it a bad thing to only have one co authored paper in a peer review at this stage? How usually post-doc recruiter (for a first post-doc) look at the publications? Are they putting weight in the "in prep" section of the curriculum? How to "defend" my profile?

4
  • 4
    I don't know what field you're in, but in math one co-authored publication in a good journal and one singly authored preprint would be a reasonably strong output for someone just finishing a PhD, especially a 3-year Ph.D. It's not obvious to me that there's a problem to solve here. – Noah Snyder Mar 27 at 20:10
  • 1
    Sorry, but this question can't be answered because it depends on who else applies for the job. More publications are certainly better. If you wish to inform yourself, check the CVs of people who have the type of job you would like to get. – Anonymous Physicist Mar 28 at 2:05
  • @NoahSnyder I am doing theoretical quantum information/computing. Good PhD have 3 papers published by the end of the phd. My concern is that when looking at my current curriculum even though i might probably have an appropriate amount of papers at the end of the Phd, my profile would not look attractive right now – StarBucK Mar 28 at 10:13
  • @AnonymousPhysicist of course the more the better. My question is from post doc recruiter, would then take in account the fact other papers are in preparation. And also the one in preprint. I am wondering how recruiter are dealing with curriculum of last year phd. This does not depend on other candidates. I just want to know how curriculum are looked at for postdoc recruitement. – StarBucK Mar 28 at 10:14
1

You should work to improve your record, however you can, but it is what it is, so you have to deal with that. I think, however, that choosing a postdoc purely by counting papers would be pretty foolish. The question should be, and, I hope, usually is, how good a fit is this candidate for this position.

I can't guarantee that everyone is rational, of course, but the nature and significance of your work should weigh heavily. And, a rational system would look at more than what you have already finished. Work in progress is a good thing. A reasonable personality is a good thing. Compatible interests, a circle of contacts (especially collaborators)... All good things.

My suggestion is that in any application, that you don't apologize for how bad you are, as you seem to be doing here. Instead, indicate how your skills match the requirements of the position and your goals looking forward.

It is easy to get a lot of work done, and maybe publications, if you only work on the easier-to-resolve problems. If you work on hard problems (harder than average), then having fewer than average publications is natural. Some questions take a long time to answer. If you are confident in your work, then project that confidence, as well as your compatibility with any position you apply for.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.