6

I recently uploaded a preprint on ArXiv (the journal I submitted the manuscript allows this) under CC BY-NC-ND. However, it can be found on ResearchGate (without my consent). While it can be removed from my profile, it still appears on ResearchGate. Can ResearchGate automatically upload papers from arXiv without the author's consent?

2
  • 1
    Interesting question. It seems that ResearchGate believes that they can: "Why can't I remove a publication page or full-text? ... We sometimes make a full-text available where a publication has a Creative Commons license. If you feel that a publication has been wrongly attributed a Creative Commons license, please contact us at www.researchgate.net/contact."
    – GoodDeeds
    Mar 18 at 16:53
  • Note that licenses are "sticky". Once you issue a license and someone takes advantage of it, you can't say oops and withdraw it (for them, at least).
    – Buffy
    Mar 18 at 19:56
4

Yes, anyone can share your work as long as they follow these restrictions.

That is the nature of an open license. You have already explicitly consented to let them do that.

The actual licence clause that matters here:

For purposes of this Public License, the exchange of the Licensed Material for other material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights by digital file-sharing or similar means is NonCommercial provided there is no payment of monetary compensation in connection with the exchange.

To answer the (very relevant) question that got buried in the comments:

If I want the preprint to appear only on arXiv and restrict platforms like ResearchGate distributing it, what license can I use?

There is a licence that you can choose which leaves you with full control over the use and copyright: arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license. There is no legal right for anyone to rehost a manuscript that you give to arXiv under these terms. The only thing it allows is arXiv (and nobody else) to host your manuscript. Nobody else can use or reshare it for any (non-fair use) reason.

20
  • 2
    Seems like it hinges on whether this violates the "non commercial" clause in the license. I don't think that's a straightforward legal determination to make.
    – Bryan Krause
    Mar 18 at 16:19
  • 1
    That's one interpretation of non-commercial. It's not the only one, and is not consistent with the CC survey of what commercial use means to the content creators and users of content they surveyed wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Defining_Noncommercial
    – Bryan Krause
    Mar 18 at 16:48
  • 6
    I don't think it is that straightforward, since ResearchGate is a commercial entity and benefits from having papers on its platform. See for example: opensource.stackexchange.com/a/1246
    – GoodDeeds
    Mar 18 at 16:49
  • 5
    @Libor ResearchGate has been sued by Elsevier over this very issue (well, a broader issue of distributing work that Elsevier feels they shouldn't, but -NC-ND works were part of the suit). I don't have a strong feeling on what the answer should be for the license, but it seems it's up to courts to decide and I doubt every court will come to the same conclusion, and I don't think it's a proper answer to say "yes they can do this". They think they can do this; others disagree.
    – Bryan Krause
    Mar 18 at 17:48
  • 3
    @DushiFdz arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license: This says "Arxiv can have this but nobody else can", and you could release it under other licenses (or give away the copyright or bury it in your backyard forever). This would not allow a third party like ResearchGate to host your work. The CC BY-NC-ND is the most restrictive of the licenses that explicitly allow anyone to use your work in almost any way they choose
    – user133933
    Mar 18 at 19:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.