9

I have a postdoc interview at the end of the month. I found a researcher's profile that's been working on the same research project I applied for. I am thinking of sending her an email or a LinkedIn message (I've already connected with her). But I don't know if that's ethical to do that or not, I am afraid that it will look like I am asking for more information as an advantage on other candidates.

I want to basically ask her a particular question about the project. The job's description mentions that they're using a method X on a tool Z. But this confuses me because I know it could mean a lot of things. I actually emailed the PI (*) way before I applied asking for a clarification and the potential similarity with an approach I have already used. I needed that information to decide if I'll apply or not, but she didn't reply to me email and I applied either way.

Now that I am invited for interview, I still need to know more details about the method X and the relationship with tool Z. Is it unethical to send such detailed question to a researcher working on the same project before the interview?

(*) Her email wasn't listed in the job description, so I used the one in the department

1
  • How could that not be ethical? Whether it might be fruitful, or worthwhile, is wholly different… Mar 25, 2021 at 23:00

4 Answers 4

29

For every job I've contemplated I have gone out and done what I consider to be the necessary due diligence. If you have connections, use them. If it involves cold-calling a person or two to ask questions, do it.

Fun story - I was considering moving from technical staff to management and an interesting position opened up. My due diligence consisted of answering two questions for myself. (1) Did I really want to be a manager, and (2) was this position the right position to step into management. In the course of a week I talked to about 10 different people, some staff, some managers, some trusted confidants. I decided the answers to (1) and (2) were affirmative, so I applied. The day for the interview arrived, and I walked into a room with 6 people, the interview committee. I had talked to every single one during my process. Not surprisingly, the interview went very well.

So, yes, go and ask. There are no ethical issues at all.

1
  • Thank you for your answer. I will email the researcher hoping she will clarify the question.
    – U. User
    Feb 17, 2021 at 16:13
13

There are no ethical concerns here. You don't need to go into an interview blind about the project.

It is possible, of course, that people have been asked not to correspond with people in the pipeline other than officially, but that is up to them.

You can ask. But the tone of your mail will determine whether people think you are looking for information or for an advantage.

You can also ask after the interview, of course, but before you need to make a decision.

4

First I think there's an important point to mention, even if it doesn't answer the question: in theory the interview is a two way street, i.e. not only the PI wants to know if you're the right person for the job, you also want to know if the job (and the PI) are right for you. There would be nothing wrong with asking some details about the job during the interview, and the decision to take the job (should it be offered) doesn't have to be made immediately.

I have seen academic job ads where canvassing is explicitly prohibited, for example see these "instructions for candidates" from University College Cork:

Candidates should note that canvassing will disqualify and will result in their exlusion from the competition.

However I don't know if this kind of question would be construed as canvassing or not, and normally if this was the case at the institution where OP applies it should be mentioned clearly in the job ad.

1

Note that many universities follow strict procedures for selecting candidates. Especially, if they are state-funded, they have to adhere to objective and transparent procedures.

Contacting your potential peers or future bosses outside formal channels may be perceived as gaining an unfair advantage over other candidates. This is a big no-no and may backfire.

To stay on the safe side, I would ask your primary contact for the interview to clarify your questions.

1
  • 3
    In most English-speaking universities, communication outside formal channels is something academics are allowed to do. Feb 17, 2021 at 23:02

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .