I have come across several journals that list only names and affiliations of those on the editorial board. As the system then insists that I select one of those names as the editor to handle my paper, I send much time searching for these names on the internet.

Why do some journals not list the interests of the editorial board members?

This is a major annoyance when trying to publish ones first paper in a new field. Perhaps the only reason is laziness. But perhaps someone has experience setting up a journal and knows a reason why a deliberate choice might be made.

  • 1
    I am voting to close because the answer, laziness, is in the question. Feb 2, 2021 at 4:39
  • 1
    Uhm... in my field there are not subject descriptions either, but I've always attributed it to the fact that everyone more or less knows what the members do, or at least who are those related to one's subfield. It's true, though, that if one arrives from a different field this is not helpful. Feb 2, 2021 at 9:24

1 Answer 1


You hit on the reason, it's the amount of work necessary to maintain an up-to-date description. Classifying research is difficult because of how specialized knowledge is these days, e.g. an example I encountered recently is two people at a social function discovering that they are both physicists, and furthermore, both submit papers to arXiv that are classed as high energy physics. This makes it sound like their work is closely related, but then it turns out that one person works on lattice quantum chromodynamics and the other works on landscape cosmology, and they have zero chance of understanding each other's papers. The journal editor will typically not know how to classify the editor. For example, for the two topics above (lattice QCD and landscape cosmology) a typical journal editor might recognize them as physics, but I would be pleasantly surprised if an editor I manage can tell both are in high energy physics.

Since the journal staff are not very capable of classifying the editorial board's subject expertise, it becomes very hard for the journal to maintain an up-to-date description. Authors are experts on their own work and therefore the best-positioned to tell who will be able to handle their paper.

That said, many journals are trying to make it easier for authors. If you get the chance to choose subject codes for your manuscript, that would be a relatively easy way to find the editor most suited to your manuscript (although you might still end up with an editor from the other end of the topic).

  • 1
    Interesting. I am perhaps noticing differences between math and physics journals. The cost of maintaining the classification and the benefits derived probably vary by field. Feb 2, 2021 at 7:02
  • Some journals just ask each editor "which field(s) are you willing to handle papers in?" and list the answer(s) next to the editor's name. Editors who get lots of papers in unwanted subfields can ask to have their list of fields made narrower. Feb 4, 2021 at 1:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .