I received a comment from a colleague that starting a sentence with "let" is not good practice. I know that starting a sentence with "let" is grammatically correct, so that is not the question. My question is if starting a sentence with "let" is good practice and acceptable in technical writing.

Here are a couple examples:

  • Let scalars be denoted by lower case letters.
  • Let x be a real number greater than zero.
  • Let the set of real numbers be denoted by R.
  • This extended discussion with answers in comments and digressions has been moved to chat. Please read this FAQ before posting another comment. Commented Jan 3, 2021 at 12:40

8 Answers 8


These are all acceptable. My personal preference would be to reserve "let" for statements that are (essentially) assignments, like the second one in the question. The other two establish notation conventions. I might say something like

We use lower case letters for scalar variables.


Lower case letters represent scalar variables.


We write R for the set of real numbers.

  • 2
    Me too. The first and the third sound distinctly non-English.
    – TonyK
    Commented Dec 31, 2020 at 22:36
  • 2
    @TonyK both are fairly standard in scientific papers Commented Jan 1, 2021 at 6:08
  • When you get right down to it, those are all notational conventions, and all are also assignments. I don't see any reason other than personal preference to treat them differently.
    – jpaugh
    Commented Jan 1, 2021 at 9:23
  • I could be splitting hairs, but OP's second example strikes me as an assignment (as it presumably introduces a previously unused quantity in a proof) rather than a notational convention. Ethan makes a good point; starting with "let" is something of a technical term within proofs so outside uses might detract from ease of reading.
    – johncip
    Commented Jan 3, 2021 at 4:11
  • 1
    Agree. In mathematics, sentences like "Let x be a real number greater than zero" or shorter "Let $x>0$" are very common. For notation, like the first and third sentences, there might be better ways that using "let", e.g. "Scalar variables will be denoted with lower case letter: $a,b,c,x,y,z$."
    – md2perpe
    Commented Jan 3, 2021 at 12:01

These sentences will appear normal to anyone educated in mathematics in the English language.

They could, perhaps, be made more concise if written without "Let" but I would not think too hard about it.

For such trivial issues, it is often wise to give your colleague what they want.

  • 8
    How could it be more concise without the word "let"? What's the more concise phrasing? I would've thought the "let" phrasing is the most concise way to phrase this
    – vijrox
    Commented Dec 31, 2020 at 16:08
  • 8
    @vrijox Active verbs: "Lower case letters denote scalars. R denotes the set of real numbers." Commented Dec 31, 2020 at 17:53
  • @eric_kernfeld Putting the first in active voice changes the meaning. But you can avoid "let" simply by getting rid of the "let": "Scalars are denoted by lower case letters." Commented Dec 31, 2020 at 18:40
  • 4
    Yes, the meanings are different. "Lower case letters denote scalars" implies that all lower case letters denote scalars, not other mathematical objects, and it allows for some scalars to be written in other ways. Though this is not exactly the same meaning, both statements will likely hold in this use case (mathematicians declaring conventions to the reader). And it's more useful to the reader to have a map from what they see (a lower case letter) to what it means (a scalar) than the reverse. This is a great example of how improving concision also improves clarity. Commented Jan 1, 2021 at 16:55

Yes, this is common in math writing. It is hard to imagine a book or long paper that doesn't use the convention to some extent.

But, I would only add that too much repetition of a phrase become tedious and even annoying to your readers. So while

Let x denote a real number.

is perfectly fine,

Assume x is a real number.

is an alternative.

Make the writing lively if possible. But clarity in math is the more important thing.

  • 25
    To me, "Let x be a real number" and "Assume x is a real number" have distinct logical meanings. The first is a type declaration, the second is part of a case distinction. In the statement of a theorem it wouldn't be wrong to use "assume" instead of "let", but "let" seems cleaner (at least if you dislike untyped variables).
    – Arno
    Commented Dec 31, 2020 at 15:16
  • 6
    A better synonym for "let" would be "suppose", or a construction like "If x is a real number, then (something)". IMO "assume" should be reserved for making an assumption about the properties of some object which will later be proved either true or false.
    – alephzero
    Commented Dec 31, 2020 at 16:10
  • 2
    @alephzero, there are a lot of possibilities, but I doubt that any working mathematician would be misled by any of them. The message here is "lively writing" not the specifics. And if you want to use "Let" and "Assume" and "Suppose" etc. in some narrow technical sense, you should explain your usage.
    – Buffy
    Commented Dec 31, 2020 at 16:13
  • 1
    I would interpret "assume x is a real number" as meaning "We already know that x is a complex number, now for the duration of this [sentence/paragraph/section], assume it's also a real number."
    – Kevin
    Commented Jan 1, 2021 at 16:03

In your first example I would actually agree that the "let" construction is not such great style. I wasn't sure why at first. But as Kimball pointed out in his comment, "let" is for definitions. You aren't really saying "let a, ..., z be 26 scalars", since you'll use those letters to stand for different scalars in different places. Besides you could just say "lower case letters denote scalars" or something like that.

The other two examples are certainly typical mathematical English.

  • 3
    The first example is not of the form "Let X be [definition]" because you are not defining scalars but just your notation for them. A cleaner way to say this with let, though certainly more old-fashioned would be "Let it be known that scalars are denoted by lower case letters."
    – Kimball
    Commented Dec 31, 2020 at 17:55
  • @Kimball, +1 and question updated to agree with you! Commented Jan 1, 2021 at 12:02

The immediate, facile answer is that "yes, it's fine, since so many people have done it already"... and, also, since your audience will certainly understand the content.

A secondary point is that quite often a more effective-and-efficient sentence structure is available, as exampled in other answers and comments. In some ways, these secondary things don't truly matter, but they can distract the reader, as well as allowing a critical reader to wonder about what you think is happening... which is probably not good.

An exaggerated case is "Let the real numbers be complete." What? Well, yes, they are, but what is the point of saying this? Or "Assume $x$ is a real number." Wait, what? What if it's not? Does one mean "here let $x$ be a real number..."? Probably. And, yes, experienced readers can decrypt the weird syntax, but there's no point in making them do so.

Alternatives to "Let $x$ be a real number..." are, for example, "For real numbers $x$, ..." and such.

  • 1
    "An exaggerated case is "Let the real numbers be complete." What? Well, yes, they are, but what is the point of saying this?" Well, presumably you're making a mathematical argument that's based on that premise - possibly involving producing a result that shows that the real numbers aren't complete, thereby producing a proof by contradiction of whatever the main thrust of your proof is.
    – nick012000
    Commented Jan 1, 2021 at 1:01
  • @nick012000, for the example you mention, I'd be inclinced to say "assume" or "suppose" [thing to be shown false], rather than "let". But, once again, perhaps language drifts even over a few decades... Commented Jan 1, 2021 at 18:55

One of the most lauded writers in mathematics in Jean-Pierre Serre. The first sentence of his book A Course in Arithmetic is "Let K be a field". The first sentence of André Weil's book Basic Number Theory begins "Let F be a finite field..." The first sentence of Section 1 of Chapter 1 of Wiles' proof of Fermat's Last Theorem is "Let p be an odd prime."

Conclusion: it is perfectly fine to start a sentence with "Let" when you are talking about fields or odd prime numbers. Maybe you can generalize this observation.


I see no problem with saying, for example, "Let x be a real number", but I often say "Choose a real number x", as well as "Take" or "Consider".

I don't really have a reason for saying it one way versus another way, but I like to mimic the language that my math professors use when going over proofs during class. They know better than me.


Obviously a matter of opinion. LGTM.

  • 9
    Expand a bit, please?
    – jakebeal
    Commented Dec 31, 2020 at 14:54
  • 7
    @jakebeal Google says that's "looks good to me". Who knew. Commented Dec 31, 2020 at 20:04
  • 5
    I really don't think this should be an answer (no offence intended, of course).
    – YiFan
    Commented Jan 1, 2021 at 7:20
  • 1
    @YiFan Several of the longer (and upvoted) answers really don't say more than this.
    – jpaugh
    Commented Jan 1, 2021 at 9:29
  • 2
    @jpaugh I disagree with that interpretation of those answers.
    – YiFan
    Commented Jan 1, 2021 at 10:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .