11

I am a Ph.D. student working on Computer Science. This is the situation. I thought of an interesting problem, and had a discussion about it with someone (call this person A) I wanted to establish a connection with. We discussed some ideas but they failed. We then stopped talking for a while.

Few weeks later I discuss this problem with another person, B, a postdoc at my group. We see no way of making progress in the first meeting. Then B tells me that C, a PhD student at my group, is also interested in the problem. We start having regular meetings the three of us (B, C and myself) and slowly make progress with the problem.

Then, after some months of silence, A contacts me proposing some early solutions to the problem that seem promising, clever and way more sophisticated than what B, C and I have been thinking of.

At this point I don't know how to proceed. Ideally, we could work on the problem the four of us, but it is unfair in light of the fact that the deepest contributions come from A, and the other three of us would be around just to help establishing the results and presenting them (A is an expert in a different field so it does need the help of one of us to make their techniques relevant, but three of us is too much I think). On the one hand, I have held discussions with B and C, which have led to essentially zero progress, but they have been interested in the topic nevertheless. Leaving them to (re)join A also sounds a bit inappropriate.

Any suggestion or advice is more than welcome. I can help clarifying the situation even more if you feel it's needed.

  • 1
    How theoretical/close to being mathematics is the area this problem is in? – Alexander Woo Nov 22 at 20:16
  • @AlexanderWoo I don't think I understand the question completely, but maybe I can describe it as a problem within computer science that can be solved with techniques from mathematics. I can see the techniques A presents will likely solve it but there are many holes that must be filled in to make a full-fledged solution. – Daniel Nov 22 at 20:18
  • 2
    Yes, that's the price of talking to multiple people. Albeit at SE it is often suggested to talk to many people etc., it tends to be forgotten that once people have a stake in a problem, their entanglement is not easily reversed. The easiest, if people agree, is to merge the groups, but I can imagine resistance from A, and probably even more from B & C. So, you really need to be prepared for the case when the merge fails. I have no good suggestion for this situation at its current stage of progress. If A is most senior, maybe you can ask them for advice. But that depends on A. Very difficult. – Captain Emacs Nov 22 at 20:52
  • @CaptainEmacs Yes, it's rather complicated. A is senior so I trust this person will have an idea about how to proceed. – Daniel Nov 22 at 21:02
  • 1
    Recommend that you wait more than an hour to pick the selected answer. At least a day may be a good idea (allow everyone onsite a chance to see it in their daily schedule). – Daniel R. Collins Nov 23 at 2:51
27

Actually, you should let A know that you and the others have been working on the problem and propose that you merge into one group. If B and C haven't been productive on it, then you might want to discuss it with them first. It might be that one or both of them isn't ready for a more intensive collaboration.

You can, jointly, be honest with A that your progress has been slow.

But it would be a mistake to arbitrarily exclude anyone.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Thanks a lot for your answer. I also think it is completely inappropriate to simply split groups. I will talk to A tomorrow and expose the whole situation. A is rather senior so I'm sure this person will know how to proceed. Thanks for the answer – Daniel Nov 22 at 21:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.