1

I'm currently learning more about arXiv's different licenses. One of them is arXiv's own perpetual, non-exclusive license. Unlike the CC licenses, it does not seem to include any clauses on attribution to the author.

Are scholars under the obligation to cite or attribute to the author of an arXiv preprint when it is under the “standard” arXiv.org non-exclusive license to distribute?

6
  • 2
    I am not sure that the arXiv license allows readers to distribute, rather than just arXiv. This page explaining the scope of each license may be relevant, which says "This license gives limited rights to arXiv..." as opposed to "This license allows reusers..." for the CC licenses. I may have interpreted it incorrectly, however.
    – GoodDeeds
    Nov 14 '20 at 15:29
  • 4
    Don't confuse copyright with scholarly ethics/norms. No matter what the license allows you to do legally, using someone else's work without giving them credit is plagiarism.
    – JeffE
    Nov 14 '20 at 16:11
  • 1
    @JeffE Right, I agree. I'm just curious about this license, because I'm planning on publishing a preprint on the arXiv in the near future myself. I'm still in doubt as to which license I should choose.
    – Max Muller
    Nov 14 '20 at 16:16
  • @MaxMuller Related threads: academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=choose+arxiv+license
    – GoodDeeds
    Nov 14 '20 at 16:23
  • @GoodDeeds Yup, I've seen some of them. Does any answer this question? If there's a duplicate, this question can be flagged as such.
    – Max Muller
    Nov 14 '20 at 16:26
1

If you use someone else's work, academic honesty requires you to cite that work. Licenses and copyright are completely irrelevant.

If you redistribute someone else's work, then the license is important. That is a matter of law, not academic honesty. The ArXiv license does not permit you to redistribute work unless you are ArXiv; attribution is irrelevant. The ArXiv license also does not authorize modification, so ArXiv cannot change the author names in a paper.

2
  • This doesn't seem to answer the question. Assuming someone wants to redistribute a paper (so para 2 applies) under the arXiv license, do they need to attribute the author? That may be off-topic, but then I think the question should be closed or migrated.
    – GoodDeeds
    Nov 16 '20 at 3:24
  • 1
    @GoodDeeds Is this better? I am not sure what the asker wants to do, but I guess they want their paper cited in other people's papers. Nov 16 '20 at 4:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.