I am beginning to develop research projects that will incorporate undergraduate researchers. I have observed that some faculty manage to create a strong lab culture, where the students that work with them seem to get a sense of achievement from simply being part of the lab and the lab culture. (I work in biology but I have seen this across disciplines)

Similarly, I would like to create an environment where there is a sense of community associated with my lab. What steps should I take to accomplish this?

  • 2
    Taking the students (assuming they are of age) out to the University Bar and being a bit less formal was always something I enjoyed in the lab where I spent my Undergrad / Masters. – GWW May 17 '12 at 1:41
  • @DQdlM Also check out my thread "In universities, how to team up with your colleagues?" academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1232/… – DavideChicco.it May 17 '12 at 7:35
  • Enthusiasm: Students in a lab should get the feeling that the professor is someone who shows as much interest and puts in as much hard work in the project as themselves. The professor may have a lot of credentials and experience, but his enthusiasm level must be the same as that of his students.
  • Emotional management: Sometime there could be students who lose their focus on research; at others, there could be slight rifts and differences in opinion between the professor and student because of their approach to the problem. There may also be problems within the students which could be distasteful. The professor must be mindful of these, try his best to ameliorate the situation and not let things go out of hand. Without getting smarmily personal, the professor must manage his lab as though it were his second family.
  • Ensuring good placement: Placement is not an indicator of research, but in reality, people use this record to gauge a lab's quality. The professor must build contacts and be willing to counsel and recommend their students to good places (each according to his ability, etc).
  • Good Results: The most important point. If students must feel a "sense of achievement from simply being part of the lab", then the output from the lab should be sensational. This involves a lot of man-management; knowing what each student is good at and how to get the best out of each one of them. Finally, though it may sound cliched, hard work is the key to good results.
  • thanks for your thoughts, points 1-3 make a lot of sense but I am unclear on what you mean by "sensational" in point #3. Do you mean that the results should be current and applied, like the kind of thing that the news would get excited about, or at the bleeding edge of the field, like something that other professionals would get excited about? This seems like a high bar for research in any lab let alone one that is simultaneously trying to train undergrads. – DQdlM May 17 '12 at 13:37
  • 1
    Thanks @DQdlM. 'Sensational' depends on how you see it: a sensation to the media may not be so to a prof. To meet your criterion ("sense of achievement from simply being part of the lab"), it is necessary to be a well-known researcher - publishing current research, being reasonably well-cited, etc. – Bravo May 17 '12 at 13:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.