5

I came out recently with a publishable idea. I analysed it theoretically, and now I need to simulate it - which will take huge amount of time apparently. I wanted to publish the idea, but I can't wait until the simulation is over. My professor suggested to go for a letter journal (each paper has a limit of 4 pages). This is the first time I write a letter paper, and it does not seem easy at all.

Any suggestions or advices to keep the content within the limit of 4 pages without overcomplicating the paper?

I wish this is not a vague question, or too specific.

EDIT: my field is computer science, but the journal is managed by electrical engineers (IEEE Communications Letters - if it is Ok to name it).

  • 4
    Have you read some papers from such a journal? I expect that doing so would probably give you some helpful ideas. I have written such a short paper myself, but in my case the idea was very small and so it wasn't a problem to stick within the limit. – Tara B Jan 17 '14 at 0:37
  • 1
    Adding which field might help get more specific answers. – Dave Clarke Jan 20 '14 at 11:59
  • 1
    You can try starting writing it as a letter (i.e. an e-mail) to your advisor, explaining the idea. – Piotr Migdal Jan 20 '14 at 12:24
3

First, follow Tara Bs advice of reading such journals (this will help in choosing the appropriate one as well). Second, try to describe your idea on a level of complexity, you would explain it to your grandparents in max 10 sentences (assuming they are no experts in your field). This gives you a nice outline of the most important concepts and context of the idea. Now dig into the topics which are really relevant, and explain them in more detail. Keep the state of the art as short as possible (but demonstrate that you know the relevant literature).

Since you have no simulation results yet, your simulation system is the result of your paper. Therefore "methods" are the way you built your system and design considerations. In the results, you can show some data from pre-tests if available.

You should keep your major paper in mind, especially make sure, the full paper will not be regarded as self-plagiarism of the short paper. But if everything goes well, you can cite your short paper in the methods section of the long one.

In my field (computer science / informatics), one would often choose a conference paper instead of a short paper, but this really depends on your scientific discipline and strategy of your institute.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.