I've authored a math research monograph (which can be however used as a textbook, as it is structured like a textbook).

Is it worth to make short version of it containing only definitions and theorems (no proofs) in the natural pedagogical order (not the order of proofs, as in the actual book)?

Will it be legal after copyright transfer?

  • 5
    What is the purpose of such a book ? Mathematics without proof sounds strange. Or do you mean to make a handbook ? – Tom-Tom Jan 15 '14 at 10:44
  • There is "main" book with proofs. I consider to create also a short version without proofs, only with results. – porton Jan 15 '14 at 11:20

You'll have to talk with your publisher (and lawyer) about what rights you retain after transfer.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.