I was wondering if it is appropriate to submit a work to a conference call, which only presents an idea without further development.

So far, in my field, computer science, I usually submit works following more or less this structure:

  • introduction

  • background

  • methods

  • proof of concept

  • evaluation

  • conclusion

Recently, I have seen a call quite interesting for presenting an idea related to my previous research. For this reason, I have to admit that I know the topic. However, the idea is not implemented, neither I evaluated it. Let's say, the work is only the method.

This scenario makes me doubt about the appropriateness of presenting my idea in the shape of a paper.

Finally, if doing this is not appropriate for a conference. Can it be for a workshop? Or even more, a lighting talk, or a poster?

EDIT ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Apart from the interesting given answers, it is important to note that there are conferences (or tracks) for position papers:

A position paper presents an arguable opinion about an issue. The goal of a position paper is to convince the audience that your opinion is valid and worth listening to, without the need to present completed research work and/or validated results.

  • What is the point of doing this? Our job as researchers is to flesh out ideas. This wastes reviewers' time. Sep 29 '20 at 5:28
  • @Prof.SantaClaus Field peculiarities. "The work is only the method" could be a decent poster in some fields; maybe Bub is originally in that field moving to CS, where conference publications are more important, as Buffy says. Sep 29 '20 at 13:47
  • In CS many conferences have an 'abstracts' track, where you can submit a 1-2 page abstract detailing the idea and the work you have done so far. there are doctoral symposiums too, as @Buffy said. Posters would work too.
    – Jihadi
    Sep 30 '20 at 7:51

In CS, conferences are like journals in other fields: the normal medium to publish fresh results. But it is results. There might be exceptions for some specialized conferences that make exceptions.

Also, many CS conferences have a Workshop track in which unfinished work can be presented and discussed. Likewise, there is sometimes a Doctoral workshop in which PhD students discuss their ongoing research and get feedback.

But for a normal paper track in a typical conference, a completed work will be expected.

  • Completed papers itself, they find thousand reasons to reject, submitting this kind of a idea paper is an entertainment for the reviewers.
    – Rajesh D
    Sep 29 '20 at 13:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.