I wrote an opinion piece for a journal but it was rejected.

I would like to put it on arxiv.org because now I do not have time to rewrite it, but I would like to circulate it. And, there are more important things to do. But, at some point I would like to submit a rewritten version to another venue. Which license should I choose on Arxiv?


  • 2
    I don't think you have given us enough information to make a significant choice. But in general if you're unsure it's probably best to go with the minimal non-exclusive license. Aug 17 '20 at 12:18
  • Do I understand correctly that all listed Creative Commons licenses allow the distribution of the paper in modified forms? If I do not want that, the first option allows only Arxiv to distribute the paper in unmodified form, right? Then that's my choice.
    – Gergely
    Aug 17 '20 at 12:29
  • @Gergely No, not all CC licenses permit modification: creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses
    – user2768
    Aug 17 '20 at 13:22
  • @user2768 I meant the listed ones that Arxiv allow
    – Gergely
    Aug 17 '20 at 13:43
  • 1
    Note that some venues may refuse a paper that has been posted to arXiv at all, regardless of what license was chosen. Aug 17 '20 at 20:02

I think there are two factors you will usually take into account:

  1. The policy of the journal or journals you expect to submit the work to. You must choose a license that is permitted by that journal. You can easily determine what is allowed using Sherpa/Romeo. Just search for the journal and look at what is allowed for "submitted version" (or accepted version) in a subject repository.

  2. Your own preferences. This is straightforward -- read the license and make sure you agree with what it allows/doesn't allow.

When in doubt, the minimal non-exclusive license is the safest bet.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.