16

Once I expressed an opinion on a question in a discussion with a person working on the problem. My opinion didn't work in its original form but could be modified a little to make it correct, i.e., although not completely correct it contained useful information.

Recently I found that the person I was having the discussion with has quoted me in a paper in an incorrect form by mentioning that I'd expressed the statement. But he has made no claims about its correctness. The person never asked me later for explanation and didn't even check if the way he is quoting me is correct. The discussion was brief and spoken. And he did not even send me a copy of his paper afterwards.

I feel that he should have asked me for clarification before quoting me in the paper or at least he should have given me notice that he is quoting it. At the time of the discussion he agreed to what I said and told me he would contact me about it and even send me a draft.

I don't like being quoted for a statement I don't know, and moreover I am a little bit pissed off by his action (quoting a brief informal discussion about a possible proof of some result without notifying me or asking me for clarification). What should I do now?

The paper is not published yet, it is on arxiv.org.

4
  • 3
    Is the paper published? If so, you could write a letter to the editor clarifying the situation. The editor may decide to publish the letter if s/he deems it appropriate. May 12, 2012 at 9:24
  • 5
    Unless he grossly misrepresented your opinion as you expressed it at the time, I'm not sure you have a legitimate complaint. So you said something that turned out to be wrong. So what?
    – JeffE
    May 12, 2012 at 13:18
  • 9
    @JeffE: It depends on the situation. Suppose someone asked me whether 2047 was prime, and (not knowing that 2047=23*89) I said I thought it was. I'd be really annoyed if they later quoted me in a paper as their source for the primality of 2047, since spreading that error would be a disservice to the readers and to me, even though technically it would be a correct quote. When you're quoting someone, if it's something you can check, you should; if it's something you can't check, then you should carefully confirm with them to make sure you are correctly quoting a well thought-out statement. May 12, 2012 at 17:05
  • 3
    (Of course, this is for research papers, where the idea is to present something true and to give correct attribution. In a historical survey, recounting someone's mistakes might be fully justified, if they played an important role in the history.) May 12, 2012 at 17:08

1 Answer 1

16

Contact the author first. Assume the best, that their memory is faulty, and suggest alternative text in a friendly manner. If you do not get a response, contact the editor of the journal they have submitted to.

Ultimately though a lot of people get misquoted, and a lot of publications get misunderstood & cited inappropriately. If it's really a big deal you might get a publication out of contradicting it, but otherwise just be glad that people think you are important enough to mention. It's better than not being given credit for your own ideas!

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .