# Using .tex files from arXiv as a template for new papers

It is well known that anyone can download the LaTeX source code of the papers on arXiv. My question is regarding the use of that source code.

Say you are working on a paper that is a follow-up to an existing one. You like the format of that paper (both structurally and graphically), and you want to keep the notation used.

Would it be reasonable/legitimate to download the source of the original paper, keep the preamble (i. e., everything before \begin{document}), and then write your own paper? Or is it downright unethical, and akin to plagiarism? Could this be softened by giving credit to the authors of the original paper in the source code (assuming that the new paper is also to be submitted to arXiv)? I am assuming that all of the content of the new paper is original. It is just part of the (not rendered) LaTeX source that is reused with minimal (or no) editing.

• Wow that is possible?? – Jens Jul 9 '20 at 21:47
• Use an official journal template like everyone else. – Anonymous Physicist Jul 10 '20 at 0:05
• "Use an official journal template" is missing the point of the question entirely. The questioner wants to use the collection of macros in a paper. This is independent of whether a journal template is used. – Vivek Goyal Jul 10 '20 at 14:55
• @AnonymousPhysicist I’m sure I’m not alone in not using a journal template - without repercussions. – Shane O Rourke Jul 10 '20 at 20:21
• I would suggest to ask the authors if you have doubt. There is a good chance that they license the preamble as public domain to you (by saying "Just use it"). – allo Jul 13 '20 at 11:59