I have submitted a preprint to arXiv. Since the paper has been accepted in a conference, I will like to mention this in the "Comments" section (where the author makes some comments about the paper) that appears in arXiv. How to do this?

Note that the paper remains the same. Only comments need to be updated.

  • 2
    Only by updating the entire preprint. Are you sure you don't want to update anything else in the preprint? Commented Jun 24, 2020 at 17:48
  • 3
    Why not wait until it's published and update the "journal reference" field?
    – Anyon
    Commented Jun 24, 2020 at 18:01
  • @Anyon I'm in this situation. Because of an application deadline. I too would like to indicate the paper has been accepted (before it's fully published).
    – a06e
    Commented Mar 8, 2023 at 20:33
  • 1
    @a06e I would expect it's more useful to indicate the acceptance in your application material (cv etc.). Relying on an easily missed comment field doesn't seem ideal. That said, if the journal allows posting the accepted version to preprint servers, you can of course modify the preprint and indicate it's the accepted version in the comment field.
    – Anyon
    Commented Mar 9, 2023 at 1:47

1 Answer 1


Comments can only be updated by submitting a new version, even if the content of the paper itself has not changed. A new version can be submitted by selecting the "Replace" option against your paper. Further details can be found here.

Comments are a part of the metadata of the paper, and the idea is that the comments should reflect the situation on the date the article was submitted on arXiv. It is possible to update journal reference and DOI without creating a new version. However, as the help page mentions, these fields are appropriate only when you have the complete bibliographic information of the conference proceedings (if any) available.

Reference from arXiv (emphasis mine):


Why? To allow authors to make changes to the comments and other metadata fields of publicly announced articles without generating a new version, and hence date stamp, would effectively mean that all changes would be backdated to the time the last version was submitted. This is open to abuse and thus not allowed.

The exceptions to this rule are the addition of journal reference and DOI information. The journal reference field may contain only full publication information for the article; the DOI field may contain only a DOI.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .