I’m now writing a masters thesis in mathematics. I’d like to introduce basic definitions and theorems in the beginning. By basic I mean truly basic, like the definition of a connected graph and the theorem about Eulerian paths (such a path exists if and only if even degrees).

The lecture notes written by my professor is really nice so I’d like to use his definitions (I’ll cite, of course). In this case can I cite his lecture notes?

  • 5
    Does this answer your question? How to cite lecture notes? (and should I even do this?) Or this?
    – henning
    May 23, 2020 at 15:21
  • 1
    @henning--reinstateMonica. I think they don't, because what I intend to cite is clearly common knowledge, but in those two questions, the first OP either is sure that he/she is not referencing common knowledge, and the second is not sure about it.
    – Robert
    May 23, 2020 at 15:39

2 Answers 2


While there is no real harm in citing it, it is unlikely to be necessary. Common knowledge is one of the exceptions to the requirement for citation. Many things that you first see in a course fall under this cover, even if they are new to you.

But you seem to be more speaking of copying the notes, rather than citing them. That may be a different issue if they can be considered to be copyrighted. In that case you want permission from him.

Do a little research in a textbook or two. Do those definitions, or something essentially similar to them appear there? I suspect they do. If so, there is no need to be concerned. And also note that one of the exceptions in copyright law (most places) is that for some things there is only one effective way to state something, so it's expression can't be copyrighted.

And it wasn't your professor who originated these ideas.

But an acknowledgement to your professor for introducing you to these ideas would be a courteous thing to do.


Lecture material like the equations you mention is considered common knowledge (I had not noticed that another answer uses the same expression), unless is comes with a non-textbook citation (e.g. if a model from X (YYYY) is discussed). It does not need citation but you should rephrase the uncited verbal parts to a reasonable extent to avoid giving a lazy impression. Copy - pasting equations is just fine, however, and if a citation is included you should use the citation directly. The only occasion that would warrant a citation that I can think of right now is if the lecture contains novel, unpublished research by the lecturer, in which case it would be acceptable. However, you should be absolutely sure that this is the case, and in addition that the lecturer wants that novelty to be cited. My strictly personal attitude is not to allow or encourage the lecture being cited (but they are free to copy the equations), and I treat it as very poor judgement when it happens.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .