I am targeting an IEEE publication that allows Traditional manuscript submission or Open Access (OA) manuscript submission. The OA fee is $2,045.
If I decide not to pay the OA fee (ie, I go for Traditional manuscript submission), can I still put the accepted paper version on arXiv?
If 1. is positive, what are the benefits of choosing the OA submission? What can't you do with the Traditional submission that you can with the OA one?
Yes, you can (and open access has nothing to do with this).
Accepted article Authors may share or post their accepted article in the following locations:
- Author’s personal website
- Author’s employer’s website
- arXiv.org
- TechRxiv.org
- Funder’s repository*
Note you have to include the IEEE copyright notice (given in the next section of the source).
Non-legal answer:
The journals (theoretically) are there to provide editorial services as well as manage peer-review.
As such, the final product, or "accepted paper version" as you put it, is a result of work of the original authors, as well as the editor and IEEE organization. These people own the copyright and so regulate the licensing. You can't just "put it on arXiv".
Legally speaking:
Consult your agreement with IEEE and potentially a copyright lawyer.
Here is what IEEE has to say, and a quote:
Can an author post his manuscript on a preprint server such as TechRxiv or ArXiv? Yes. The IEEE recognizes that many authors share their unpublished manuscripts on public sites. Once manuscripts have been accepted for publication by IEEE, an author is required to post an IEEE copyright notice on his preprint. Upon publication, the author must replace the preprint with either 1) the full citation to the IEEE work with Digital Object Identifiers (DOI) or a link to the paper’s abstract in IEEE Xplore, or 2) the accepted version only (not the IEEEpublished version), including the IEEE copyright notice and full citation, with a link to the final, published paper in IEEE Xplore.
About point 1: the author accepted manuscript (AAM) is something which is prepared independently from IEEE and before any copyright transfer paperwork is signed. So IEEE certainly cannot forbid you from posting the AAM on arXiv or elsewhere, if you do so before signing copyright transfer paperwork. What they can do (and often will do) is require you to sign copyright transfer agreements that are incompatible with what you have already done, with the risk that they won't publish the final version of the article if you don't comply.
Note that, in some cases, your employer or funding agency may in fact be requiring you to post the AAM online under a permissive license, notwithstanding any rules from the publisher. For instance, you may be covered by the rights retention strategy if funded by a cOAlition S funder, you may be covered by mandatory archiving policies from your employer, etc.
To elaborate a bit on this: the point of rights retention strategies is essentially to submit the article with boilerplace acknowledgements indicating that due to funder/institutional requirements the authors will be posting the AAM online under a permissive license (e.g., CC-BY); then post the AAM online (notwithstanding any publisher rules to the contrary); then require the publisher to accommodate this in subsequent copyright transfer agreement. The idea is that if researchers are required to do this by a critical mass of funding agencies and institutions, then publishers will have no choice to accommodate it.
About point 2: the "benefit" of IEEE gold open-access is that is allows you to make sure that the publisher version of the article, with the journal formatting and publisher changes, is available as open-access -- not just the AAM.
