3

Is writing Author A & Author B the same as writing Author A, Author B in the author list?

To make it clear, this question asks about formulating the author list in the author section when publishing a paper.

The field is computer science. Is there a way to signify that Author A is the first author?

  • Why do you think there is a "first author" rather than a true collaboration? – Buffy Apr 15 at 15:04
  • 1
    If authorship order matters in your subfield (as opposed to having alphabetical as the default), most likely Author A will be interpreted as the first author unless explicitly specified otherwise (e.g., using a footnote to indicate that first authorship is shared). – GoodDeeds Apr 15 at 16:34
0

The ampersand and the comma mean essentially the same thing here. The one who is listed first is the first author. (In this case, Author A is the first author in both cases.)

Clarification: The definition of "first author" that I am familiar with is the author who is listed first. In any list, there is always a first item; therefore, there is always one (and only one) first author. I am not familiar with using the term "first author" to mean "the one with the most significant contribution."

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Mostly in CS we are happy with alphabetical listings. – Buffy Apr 15 at 15:03
  • 3
    @Buffy In theoretical CS only, I think? – Islam El-Rougy Apr 15 at 15:15
  • @IslamEl-Rougy, not only, actually, but maybe not universally either. – Buffy Apr 15 at 15:17
  • I think you are making an assumption that the authors do not intend. Ask them. Otherwise you may be making an error as well as an assumption. – Buffy Apr 15 at 15:57
  • The list of authors involves me in this case. – user2679290 Apr 15 at 16:11
3

Is writing Author A & Author B the same as writing Author A, Author B in the author list? (when publishing a paper)

You don't have a choice, the journal's style guide will do it for you. In cases where there is a list and not a block (or otherwise separated), an ampersand will be used for the last author in every case I'm aware of.


Original answer

In citation formats I'm familiar with (e.g. APA), using a comma with only two authors is never correct.

In other words, Author A., Author B. (2020) looks like a mistake, as if the third author (who would be separated by an &) were missing.

It makes no difference with regards to who is the "first" author.

| improve this answer | |
  • Citation is not what the question is about, but it is a nice addition. – user2679290 Apr 15 at 15:54
  • @user2679290 Oh, did you mean writing it that way in the references? My point would hold, it would still look like an error. – Azor Ahai -- he him Apr 15 at 16:02
  • No, I meant writing like this in the author section of a paper. – user2679290 Apr 15 at 16:07
  • 2
    @user2679290 Oh I see. You don't have a choice, it follows the journal's guidelines in any case (some don't have lists, and use blocks, where your question would be nonsensical). – Azor Ahai -- he him Apr 15 at 16:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.