I am currently reviewing a paper, which is definitely not suitable for the journal where it was submitted (high impact, topics should be interesting for a broad audience). The content is not new and in this current state not sufficient for publication at all.
I would now recommend rejection with reference to some literature which covers the same results. I would suggest some more detailed experiments for the authors, to quantify their results and then submit it to a journal with a more narrow focus.
Here my questions: Is it ok, if I write a precise journal, like
I recommend to submit a revised manuscript to Journal XYZ, which is more focused on the authors' topic.
or should I write;
I recommend to submit a revised manuscript to another journal, which is more focused on the authors' topic.