0

I'm currently diving in a field I'm no expert in, mainly I have methodological expertise and a theoretical background, but not in the research object itself.

Now I'm seeing this is a field of applied phyiscs with really a lot of patents being published, still a fundamental science field. To me it's clear that in branches like AI or quantum computing research the Intel, IBM, Apples research groups are probably several years ahead in some research questions in comparison to academic research groups in expertise, depth and equipment and probably most of their secrets and knowledge is not published, rather kept secret and in the best case (for scientists) filed as a patent. Of course they collaborate with some academic groups intensively and also publish papers (last weeks quantum computation record of google unintentionally became public). But papers can only be published years after a patent is granted to my knowledge.

Though I'm no expert in patent research and databases and language. But as a researcher/postdoc can I risk to focus only on journal publications to inform myself and stay up to date or is not a necessity to also look up the recent patents as they are more up to date in state of the art and knowledge than papers? Often keywords don't help here as patents are written very different to papers. So also practically, patents are really not good to self-inform.

What strategies are there to not start research on something already solved by industry? Attending much more industry symposia? Skimming patents? Has industry in general a high/low incentive to share their secrets and questions/problems they try to solve? In my field a lot of governmental and industry money (several hundred millions) are flowing into this research branch in form of academic funding. How do you deal with this problem/opportunity to keep yourself informed? Reading the most cited patents like for papers and do citations have similar value at all in patent literature?

  • Have you tried reading patents? – Patricia Shanahan Nov 23 '19 at 4:44
  • @PatriciaShanahan I have and some have information in them like a technical paper but you need 3-4x the time to read it or it's a pretty waste of time. The question is if it worth to invest this time and how much knowledge/secrets industry puts there as I never filed patents and do not have strong collaborations with industry. Did you read my question? ;-) – user48953094 Nov 23 '19 at 10:50
  • 1
    Yes, I read the question. It was not clear to me from the question that you were aware how hard it is to read patents. Personally, I have trouble reading even the ones for which I was an inventor. – Patricia Shanahan Nov 23 '19 at 22:33
2

This may vary by field, but in my opinion most patents are not very useful for a researcher. The patents that I have read are all written by attorneys in attorney-speak. Trying to figure out what is the real technical content behind the attorney-speak is difficult if not impossible.

To give an example: I used to work at a large company. My company wanted to patent some of the work that I had done. My boss had me send my material to the attorneys, and they drafted the formal patent application based on my work. When I received the patent application back, I could not even understand what the patent was talking about, and it was something that I had literally invented. So good luck to anybody else trying to understand what it means.

Occasionally I have come across some good technical content in patents, but it's usually in the situation where the researchers have filed a patent first and then published a journal article immediately afterwards. They did the patent just to protect their intellectual property. In that case the patent does have some good info, but the corresponding journal article is even better.

Again, your mileage may vary. In some fields I guess this might be different.

  • Part of a patent attorney's job is to claim as wide a domain of applicability as possible. So an invention intended for purpose A could result in a patent filing that claims it could be used for A, B, C, ..., Z. All those speculative applications can add up to a haystack, hiding the needle of useful information. – Andreas Blass Nov 24 '19 at 2:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.