4

I am a PhD student in electrical engineering, and I recently found out a published paper from another research group which I am collaborating through a joint project using exactly my idea and the data that I collected.

I don't have any public evidence that I was working on it, but since it is a joint project, the other research group was aware of my research and my ideas.

On their paper, they don't mention my work, they don't acknowledge and they didn't ask permission to use the data that I collected. They had access to my data because I needed to use their equipment to collect the data.

The paper that they published won the best overall paper of the conference and they got a prize of €2000.

I contacted the head of the research group to make them withdraw their paper, but they don't agree, they claim they are doing something different, but they suggested to add myself as one of the authors (even after the paper was published), which I don't agree at all since I didn't work on this paper.

I have evidences through emails, meetings and presentations that they were aware of my research. I would like advice on how to proceed.

  • 3
    You seem to have repeated issues with authorship/credit, as evidenced by your previous question academia.stackexchange.com/questions/137554/…. Are you sure that your current work environment is one that you are comfortable in? – Spark Nov 5 '19 at 3:55
  • @Spark I am definitely not comfortable, I had so many problems throughout this journey, but I want to finish my PhD. I don't see other option rather than keep persisting on it. – user1998012 Nov 5 '19 at 10:43
  • 2
    Well, your PhD thesis will not be worth very much if you can't publish effectively, and working in an environment you hate may take a significant emotional and mental toll on you in the short and long run. Fix these issues, or consider alternatives (I would if I were you). – Spark Nov 5 '19 at 13:47
  • I already got a job offer in a much better place, conditional in successfully completing my PhD. Now I am just focusing in finishing it. – user1998012 Nov 5 '19 at 13:54
  • 1
    Ah ok, well - good luck! – Spark Nov 5 '19 at 14:01
4

Talk to your advisor. If you have compelling evidence they may be willing to stake their reputation and research collaboration with this group in order to get them to at least acknowledge your contribution after the fact. Again, you need to be prepared to hear that your advisor will be very limited in what they can do apart from trying to straighten things out informally. Given that papers usually take several months to write, I’m curious to know why no one knew about this happening.

Ownership of the idea is going to be hard to argue at this point given that the paper has already been published (and has won an award!). It won’t be withdrawn, it probably can’t be withdrawn since it’s already been published, not a reversible action in most cases. The authors could say that you misunderstood, that they independently came up with the idea, or any number of plausible sounding defenses.

Your best plan forward is perhaps to be involved in follow up work, and be more careful with this group who’s acted in an unethical and mean way.

Finally, if you really feel like you would like to escalate it further, reach out to your university's ombudsperson, vice-dean for research matters, or department head (depending on your university's structure the point of contact differs). Again, since you say you don't have public evidence of precedence, I doubt there's much they could do, but at the very least that would be the correct order of doing things.

In particular, I would most definitely not go to the conference chairs, publicly post something online, or escalate this further before consulting with the appropriate people. You would be burning serious bridges by doing something like that, and chairs/editors are very much averse to getting involved in such things if they don't have to. You may end up looking like some bitter person who sees a colleague's best paper and wants in on the action after the fact.

|improve this answer|||||
  • Thanks for your answer. My advisor agrees that there was plagiarism, but he criticized my work throughout my PhD and never let me publish it. My research is more complex and do much more deep analysis than the paper published by the other group. I can blame this is my advisor's fault for never let me publish it, but another research group stealing my research is such a bad move from them. My advisor was telling me he is not sure he want to work with them again. – user1998012 Nov 5 '19 at 11:10
  • It sounds like your advisor is not putting their best efforts when considering you and your research (or at the very least you seem to believe this, which is the same for all intents and purposes). I would suggest having a serious talk with them, and an introspection regarding your own prospects with them. – Spark Nov 5 '19 at 13:44
  • All this type of questions rise doubs. I really met people who were deeply convinced of their ideas/data to have been stolen with absolutely no ground for that :) this in a very good answer as it covers several facets. – Alchimista Nov 6 '19 at 10:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.