After some decades an event on my research area was announced in my city, so I decided to send my abstract, which was accepted.

However, they recently sent me the programme and among the keynote speakers was a person whose doctoral thesis contains uncontroversial plagiarism. (About 30 pages of his thesis are just a translation from two papers written in English by other scholars into the language in which the thesis was written.) There are no legal charges against this lecturer. Instead, the plagiarism was revealed by an apparently anonymous source about two or three years ago through a mailing list.

I know that at least some of the organisers of the event were in such mailing list, so they do not ignore the charges and had the chance to test whether they were true or not.

I have considered that maybe the best option to withdraw my lecture from the event explaining exactly why to the organisers. This, though, would not help at all, since they already know and do not care. Else they wouldn't have invited him as keynote speaker.

Other option that somebody suggested me is that I use some minutes of my lecture to publicly denounce him. (It just happens that my regular lecture starts right after his keynote lecture finishes.) But there are three problems with this:

  1. When publicly denounced, this lecturer threatened to prosecute the source for defamation. (He's also lawyer.) I currently do not have a job nor a regular income that would allow me to face a prosecution, let alone to prosecute him.

  2. It is very likely that most of the people that are going to the event already know. In such case, and since this is fairly yesterday news, I do not expect that there be any important reaction.

  3. I am about to enter in the phase of defending my thesis, and this lecturer works in my institution as invited professor. Unscrupulous as he is, he may try to retaliate against me by using his power to delay my thesis dissertation. (I do not know how much power he has.)

Finally, you may be surprised as to how a whole academic community could care so little about this case. But I have to say that when the news about his plagiarism came, I myself didn't dare to publicly speak disapproving his behaviour because of what I said in the third point. Still, it was surprising to me that, although I know that several professors disapproved of his actions, apparently none of them publicly manifested their disapproval. I later knew that this wasn't the first time that something like this happens in my institution.

I'd like to know what is the most ethical or less unethical thing to do in this case. One thing is for sure, though. I do not think it would be right for me to go to that event, and speak after him as if he were a respectful scholar. And I am not going to.

Thanks in advance for any advice.

  • 3
    Your feeling of outrage may not be felt quite as intensely by many of the participants and protesting no matter how public or damaging to yourself, may not have much impact on others unfortunately - theconversation.com/… The plagarist is very personal to you as he is in your department. The personal rawness will not be felt by others, the same way as family violence is very hushed, it seems unlikely that the plagiarism will be dealt with as he is already an invited speaker...
    – Poidah
    Oct 9, 2019 at 7:49

2 Answers 2


What really matters here is what your goal is. Is your goal to: (A) cause there to be some sort of disciplinary action/reaction against this person; or (B) to make sure that your own name is not tarnished by association with this person in the future.

If you are hoping for (A) I believe that you have answered your own question. It does not appear that any action will be taken against this person based on anything you do in relation to this conference. The discipline is covering this up and everyone is going along with it and as an early career researcher, you are not influential enough to change this. It's sad, but it's true. However (B) is entirely possible for you. If you believe that one day this person will be publicly shamed and denounced fully by the discipline, it is not unreasonable for you to not want your name associated with theirs. This might mean withdrawing from the conference and specifically asking that your name be removed from any material online about the event. Indeed, you don't even need to say why you are pulling out of the event if that includes a risk that it will get back to the person in question.

In this situation, I think (B) is a reasonable concern and a reasonable reason to not speak at a conference. I also think that you are tangentially associated with this person so are unlikely to experience any negatives from speaking after them at the event. Ultimately, with risk of association low, it comes down to your own ethical stance and if you feel sharing a stage with this person violates that.

  • Thanks, @GrotesqueSI. I hope I could aim for (A) in the most civilised manner, but you have already pointed out how unlikely is it for me make any impact. But more than trying to denounce him, or avoid any association with him, what I don't want is to recognise him as a respectful scholar. I feel that going to an event where he's a keynote speaker is to give him that recognition.
    – lfba
    Oct 9, 2019 at 10:04
  • 1
    By presenting your work you are not recognising him as respectful person. You are just presenting your work. Dot. So go. @Ifba
    – Alchimista
    Oct 9, 2019 at 11:02
  • Would speaking at a conference where someone is the keynote speaker count as a meaningful academic association in some context? Or maybe it would depend on the size of the conference.
    – Tommi
    Oct 9, 2019 at 12:19
  • You have a very good point, @Alchimista. I want to be clear that I would never judge anyone who would rather present their work without saying a word on the matter. (Except if it was a fairly respected scholar, in which case "judge" wouldn't be the right verb.) Although I am beginning in my career, this year I'm having the opportunity to present my work in several other events. Perhaps that's why I'm more willing to sacrifice my talk in the aforementioned event.
    – lfba
    Oct 9, 2019 at 14:06

Your question is really silly. You are going to attend a lot of events in future in your career. Are you going to check on every keynote speaker on whether they have plagiarised in any of their works? Secondly, its not your obligation to bring to light, this plagiarism in public. There is a system, and the advisor and review committe of the plagiarised thesis are the ones who should be really concerned with this. Its their business/headache. You are asking, Can I buy other people's headache?

  • 5
    People who think academic dishonesty is not their problem are part of the problem. Oct 9, 2019 at 17:31
  • 1
    @GrotesqueSI Has the person already been accused and pronounced guilty? If not, making such a highly visible accusation is dangerous. A conference is simply not the time or place for it. What if it is determined not to be plagiarism? Now an accusation has been made that can be/would be VERY detrimental to their career. A defamation lawsuit would be only the beginning. Praise in public, chastise in private. Ensure the supposed plagiarism is or has been brought up in the proper forum, then let things happen in their time. Note this not "not my problem."
    – CGCampbell
    Oct 9, 2019 at 18:00
  • @CGCampbell I don't believe you read my response to this question. Nowhere and in no way did I suggest the person who posted this should make any sort of accusation. Indeed, I suggested that if they did choose to pull out of the conference, they should consider not indicating specifically why to avoid retaliation. I though the poster's question was legitimate, and I thought this answer calling the question "silly" was rude and unhelpful. Oct 9, 2019 at 20:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .