1

I am a Ph.D. student. An application agent company approached me and ask if I could be a casual consulter on their platform and give some advice to the students who want to apply for the Ph.D. position in my country. Usually, there will be only 5 or 6 hours of workload a month and they pay 5000 dollars a year. The work is about that I teach them how to apply, like what they should focus on, when to write the emails to the professors, how to write the emails to get the professor's attention, where to search the useful information about the opening PhD positions. And the agent also asked me whether I could write the personal statement or even upload the application materials for their students. I refused as I think this might be inappropriate. I am a PhD student who wants to do causal work and earn some extra money but not a real application agent. But consultation work seems to be fine. I also see some Ph.D. students from universities even like Oxford doing the paperwork writing. I guess they pay a lot if you do such kinds of work.

There are quite a lot of such companies. If you pay enough, they could deal with almost everything including paperwork writing, resume refinement, etc. for you during the application. I have already seen dozens of PhDs on their website. Some work on paperwork and some just work on consultation. Most of the PhDs’ major is English literature. I received a lot of emails from such companies. Usually I would ignore them except this one promised me that I could just do the consultation. Writing the personal statement for the others could be really annoying.

I think it is interesting as I could know some potential PhDs in my field and also I could get paid. But I just want to know if this involves some kind of conflict of interest as maybe I would help others apply for my own university in the future.

Improve this question
5
  • Some aspects of what you say sound a bit like a bribe. Can you say more? Are you sure it is legit?
    – Buffy
    Oct 5, 2019 at 12:23
  • no... it is not a bribe. It is just I tell them how to apply. What they should focus on like when to write the emails to the professors, how to write the emails to get the professor's attention, where to search the useful information about the PhD position... I will add this part on.
    – hidemyname
    Oct 5, 2019 at 12:33
  • 3
    This is the first time I've heard about an "application agent company"!
    – user2705196
    Oct 5, 2019 at 13:26
  • There are quite a lot in fact. If you pay enough, they could deal with almost everything including paperwork writing, resume refinement, etc. for you during the application. I have already seen dozens of PhDs on their website. Some work on paperwork and some just work on consultation. Most of the PhDs’ major is English literature. I received a lot of emails from such companies. Usually I would ignore them except this one promised me that I could just do the consultation. Writing the personal statement for the others could be really annoying.
    – hidemyname
    Oct 5, 2019 at 14:57
  • I don’t think this is a conflict of interest as it’s usually defined in academia, since you are not playing any part in the admissions process in your university (if you were, then it certainly would be a conflict of interest). However I think the question you’re asking is the wrong question. The real question is whether doing this work would be ethical. A COI is only one specific type of ethics problem. For example writing someone else’s personal statement is blatantly unethical for anyone to do regardless of whether they are associated with the university the statement gets sent to.
    – Dan Romik
    Oct 5, 2019 at 15:49

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2

Three thoughts:

(1) It's hard to see how this is a conflict of interest if you have no role (even informally) in the admissions process.

(2) Writing an applicant's personal statement for them is unethical. If you are advising students on the best strategies for dealing with particular individuals in your department, that also seems a bit like "insider information."

(3) You should consider the (not so remote) possibility that your department will become aware of your role on this platform. If you are okay with this, then it is likely ethical. You may even want to consider discussing it proactively with a trusted professor (e.g., the graduate program director).

Improve this answer
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .