2

I have to choose between a transaction journal on Network science and engineering with impact factor ( 2.5) and IEEE internet of things journal with 9 impact. I know that people prefer transactions journals. What do you recommend me to do ? Which one is more better in my CV as a Ph.D. student.

closed as off-topic by lighthouse keeper, Anyon, Flyto, Enthusiastic Engineer, ZeroTheHero Sep 15 at 22:46

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:

  • "The answer to this question strongly depends on individual factors such as a certain person’s preferences, a given institution’s regulations, the exact contents of your work or your personal values. Thus only someone familiar can answer this question and it cannot be generalised to apply to others. (See this discussion for more info.)" – Anyon, ZeroTheHero
  • "“Shopping” questions, which seek recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics, or similar as an answer or seek an assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See this post on meta for more information.)" – lighthouse keeper, Flyto, Enthusiastic Engineer
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    Probably you need to understand why IoTJ has a high IF. I note that IoTJ has many poor quality papers -- one reason is because of the high volume and quick turnaround time. As for the aforementioned Trans., the quality of papers is high, but the community is much smaller or much more specialized as compared to the IoTJ community, which tends to be multi-disciplinary comprising of industry people to academics that work on all layers of the protocol stack. – Prof. Santa Claus Sep 15 at 0:19
  • Also because of the high volume, the editors of IoTJ have lots of discretion to reject papers and deem them to be 'out of scope'. – Prof. Santa Claus Sep 15 at 0:22
2

I don't know about your specific journals, but Impact Factor is a fake measure and should be ignored. Both the idea of measuring "impact" by number of citations and the methodology itself to collect such data are flawed, hence impact factors constitute meaningless information in most cases.

What is important are the norms in your scientific community. Ask your colleagues what is better. Do not look at "impact factors".

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.